English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Researchers' communities think bananas have a lack of reliability.

How should I say this?

  1. There was a lack of reliability in the bananas, from the researchers' communities.
  2. There was a lack of reliability of the bananas, in the researchers' communities.

Or none of the above?

share|improve this question
Are bananas unreliable test subjects in an experiment or is their availability unreliable? – Tungsten Feb 28 '11 at 6:07
Bananas are unreliable test subjects. – John Assymptoth Feb 28 '11 at 12:38

Between those two choices I would have to go with "of", as reliability is a concept possessed by the banana as a whole rather than an ingredient contained by the banana.

However, the sentence would benefit greatly from re-wording to eliminate the passive voice and its unnecessarily complex structure:

The bananas were unreliable in the researchers' communities.

The researchers' communities felt that the bananas could not be relied upon.

The bananas had no reliability as far as the researchers' communities were concerned.

share|improve this answer
The first option sounds a bit strange: "The bananas were unreliable in the researchers' communities." Are you sure it is correct? – John Assymptoth Feb 27 '11 at 18:54
It would probably be better put as "The bananas in the researchers' communities were unreliable." – Hellion Feb 28 '11 at 0:25
+1, but you failed to motivate your choosing "bananas" as from the OP's first example over "babanas" from the second. – Cerberus Feb 28 '11 at 3:30
I thought about putting in "Where the heck are our babanas?!" was a constant refrain from the research community, but ultimately decided against it. – Hellion Feb 28 '11 at 3:34

protected by RegDwigнt Apr 9 '13 at 23:37

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.