Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've always been taught to write it alike the former, but personally, I think the latter looks better. Why is it that most people write it alike the former?

share|improve this question
2  
Commas are never required by law, and in a date they are optional. If it's meant to be read out loud, commas make sense because they indicate intonation dips. But if it's intended to be read only -- and always when intended for machine reading -- commas have no purpose. The specified order and separators of the various date parts is much more important for machines. –  John Lawler Dec 8 '13 at 19:28
    
I've never used the 'th' or the 'of'. It's always been 8 December, 2013 or December 8, 2013 - Or even more commonly, 12/8/13. –  Jolenealaska Dec 8 '13 at 23:05

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

In my professional career, it was always 8 December 2013. Just like that. How you choose to pronounce it is another matter.

share|improve this answer
    
Do you know why that has become the custom, to write it like that? –  Ryan Dec 8 '13 at 20:12
    
It's clear and uncluttered. Commas and 'th' (or 'rd') add nothing. –  Barrie England Dec 8 '13 at 20:18
    
Well sure, but then again, nobody ever refers to “the 4 of July” or “the 1 of January” or “the 25 of December” or “Remember remember the 5 of November”. –  tchrist Dec 8 '13 at 20:26
1  
'A date which will live in infamy' –  Barrie England Dec 8 '13 at 20:57

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.