English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I watched news about turkeys this morning and instead of calling them chickens the news anchor called them birds.

In my opinion, turkeys are sub-type of chickens. They are not a bird because they cannot fly. (In my native language, most birds can fly.)

What is the difference between chickens and birds? Why did they call turkeys birds, not chickens?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by tchrist, Kristina Lopez, medica, Mr. Shiny and New 安宇, andy256 Dec 16 '14 at 4:33

  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This is a question on taxonomy in biology forum. If you opine that Turkeys are a sub-type of Chickens, or that birds that cannot fly should not be called birds, in that forum, you might get quite a few LOLs or even voted down. Read up on the taxonomy of Turkey from wikipedia. BTW, penguin is a bird. Please, I beg you, read up from wikipedia before making such LOLable opinions. – Blessed Geek Nov 20 '13 at 2:14
Chickens are birds, too. Both turkeys and chickens are poultry (which may be the word you're looking for). – Peter Shor Nov 20 '13 at 2:25
Ostriches and emus can't fly but they are classed as birds too. @PeterShor answer, poultry, is probably what you meant instead of chicken. You could edit your question, and explain that in your language (which is?) turkeys are not considered to be poultry. If that were true. thefreedictionary.com/poultry – Mari-Lou A Nov 20 '13 at 8:09
Pls don't apply Thai language nuances to English. Even Thai language has to conform to scientific conventions. – Blessed Geek Nov 24 '13 at 5:35
This question appears to be off-topic because it is based on a mistaken notion that being a bird has something to do with flight, or that poultry cannot fly. This is biological nonsense. – tchrist Dec 15 '14 at 22:47

I assure you turkeys can fly. As a matter of fact the first you hear/see/feel on in flight, you'll remember it. They are loud and a little scary. A chicken is Gallus gallus or Gallus domesticus. A turkey belongs to the species Meleagris galloparvo. Both are birds, belonging to the class Avis. Taxonomically, they are classified in the same family. Many chickens, Gallus spp., can and do fly, although it is obvious why they are not bred for flight.

share|improve this answer
The question is a good one. It is not surprising that there is not a word-for-word translation for chicken/bird/fowl back and forth between languages. These animals occupy different roles in different location. I had a friend once who did not speak English, but would argue that pigeons and chickens were the same thing. To make the issue even more complex, the taxonomy of various species changes from time to time. – Michael Owen Sartin Nov 20 '13 at 2:31
Wild turkeys fly but domesticated ones, i.e. those bred on farms, cannot. Your answer is a little misleading. nwtf.org/all_about_turkeys/wild_turkey_facts.html – Mari-Lou A Nov 20 '13 at 8:04
As God is my witness... – Malvolio Dec 26 '13 at 4:06
The flying ability of turkeys doesn't depend on whether they are wild or domesticated. It depends on their weight. Young domesticated turkeys can fly just as well as wild ones. If a wild turkey was artificially fattened to twice it's normal size, it wouldn't be able to get off the ground, either. – ekhumoro Dec 26 '13 at 21:39

A bird is any member of the class Aves. Chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) are both galliform ("chicken-like") birds, but they are not at all similar. Turkeys are much larger, up to 40 kg although typically around 10 kg, compared to chicken, which are a quarter as heavy. More importantly, chickens are tastier than turkeys.

Being able to fly, although common among birds is neither universal among them (think about penguins, ostriches, kiwis and dodos), nor unique to them. Bats, many insects, and pterosaurs can fly, and there are gliding species of squirrels, primates, fish, squids, spiders, and horrifyingly, snakes.

share|improve this answer

In the New Oxford dictionary, the definition for bird is the following

1 a warm-blooded egg-laying vertebrate distinguished by the possession of feathers, wings, and a beak and (typically) by being able to fly.

Notice how it says typically, before "can fly". That means that birds don't necessarily have to be able to fly. Also the meaning of chicken:

1 a domestic fowl kept for its eggs or meat, esp. a young one. • meat from such a bird: roast chicken.

This shows that chickens are just a certain category for birds. Going on with that, it is perfectly acceptable to call a turkey a bird as well as a chicken, since it falls into both categories.

share|improve this answer
A turkey should never be called a chicken in English. They are not the same things at all. – Jim Nov 20 '13 at 2:55
Well, if you look at the definition of chicken, then technically speaking a turkey can be called a chicken. But, your comment is a good one, because I would never call a turkey a chicken in real life. – NickelMonster Nov 22 '13 at 2:58
@Anonymous- In English we make a distinction. It's the same reason that we don't call Penguins Ostriches- because they are entirely different species each with their own distinct name. – Jim Nov 23 '13 at 4:48
@Anonymous: Why does one call a Tiger a Bigcat, and not a Lion? Because a Tiger is not a Lion, nor a kind of Lion. Different species. A chicken is one species and a Turkey is a different one, and the fact your language makes a mess of that doesn't mean all languages make the same mess! (moreover, tigers and lions are related closely enough to crossbreed. Turkeys and chickens can't crossbreed, they are definitely different species.) – SF. Dec 26 '13 at 5:18
@NickelMonster: Oxford Dictionary entries are descriptive, not converting taxonomical names. If two flowers look the same, their description in OED will be very similar, which doesn't mean they are the same plant. Would you call a duck a chicken too? Because it meets the definition as well! What about ostrich? They are kept as domestic fowl, for meat and eggs too! – SF. Dec 26 '13 at 5:25

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.