English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I’m writing a piece of documentation and I want to add the links I'm referring to at the bottom of my document.

Since they are links and not books, I think the section title should not use the word bibliography.

The most appropriate term that comes to mind is linkography. However, I don't know if this word even exists. I did not find it in the dictionary. I think the word is ugly, and my computer’s spell-checker does not know it.

Is linkography the best term to use when referring to web links? Does this word really exist?

share|improve this question
While the Urban Dictionary is hardly an authoritative reference, the fact that linkography is in there means somebody has used it. But if you'd rather use the word bibliography, nobody is going to object that you're using it for links rather than books. Merriam-Webster defines it as "a list of the books, magazines, articles, etc., that are mentioned in a text". I think links clearly fall under the category of "etc." – Peter Shor Oct 30 '13 at 12:20
up vote 7 down vote accepted

I'd avoid "Linkography", as readers are unlikely to be familiar with it.

You can write "References" instead. This works for links as well as books.

By the way, be careful of the etymological fallacy. The word bibliography may contain biblio-, but that doesn't determine its meaning in the modern language. To figure that out, you need to consult a dictionary or look at actual usage.

share|improve this answer
"References" is perfect. Thanks! – SamK Oct 30 '13 at 12:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.