Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

Is there a difference in meaning and/or connotation between "can not" and "cannot"?

I have read and seen both used interchangeably, but I know people who argue for a slight difference in meaning. That is, cannot indicates that there is an incapability whereas can not indicates the possibility of absence. Is this a real difference?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Bradd Szonye, Janus Bahs Jacquet, Armen Ծիրունյան, Kristina Lopez, FumbleFingers Oct 22 '13 at 23:37

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
The linked question does not directly address this matter, but the accepted answer does. –  Bradd Szonye Oct 22 '13 at 20:43
    
Yes, there's a real difference. There's some brief discussion in Zwicky and Pullum's 1983 Cliticization vs. Inflection (page 9 of the PDF), which in turn cites Horn's 1972 dissertation On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. –  snailboat Oct 22 '13 at 20:44
    
@snailboat: They are clearly talking about the two different phonetic realisations, though (as indicated by the fact that they employ stress marks), which do not necessarily correspond neatly to the two different orthographic forms. –  Janus Bahs Jacquet Oct 22 '13 at 21:33
    
@JanusBahsJacquet If you read the cited Horn (not available online), you'll see that he asserts there is an orthographic convention distinguishing the two (where can not is ambiguous, but cannot is not). –  snailboat Oct 22 '13 at 21:57

1 Answer 1

Both are acceptable, but cannot is now more common. OED has this much to say about cannot:

(ˈkænət)
the ordinary modern way of writing can not: see CAN v.

Notwithstanding, in some situations ambiguity may arise if you write can not, and the difference might not be a minor one. Compare:

  • I cannot make love to you. (Something is stopping me from it, be it objective or subjective. Put differently: I am not able to make love to you.)
  • I can not make love to you. (Same as above. But also: Reckon with the possibility of my refusing to make love to you. Put differently: I am able to not make love to you.)
share|improve this answer
    
Btw, I will not often say (ˈkænət,ˈkænɒt); it's almost always (kəˈnɑt) or more emphatically (kæˈnɒt). OED doesn't make a mention of that typically American pronunciation, but some other dictionaries do. –  Talia Ford Oct 22 '13 at 21:10
    
This is a great answer. If I could offer a little clarification. What Talia is saying is that someones the expression isn't joined in one word because "not" doesn't belong to the "can." In the second sentence the not is attached to "make" rather than "can." it is "I can not-make love" rather than "I can-not make love" –  Fraser Orr Oct 22 '13 at 22:41
    
@FraserOrr I believe Talia Ford is saying that the second sentence has both interpretations available. –  snailboat Oct 22 '13 at 22:58

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.