English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does erudite carry positive or negative or neutral connotation?

I received a comment on my writing style from a mathematician a while ago

Why not try for direct active voice and stop trying to make it sound erudite?

share|improve this question
I'm guessing that the comment in the linked post was trying to communicate that since you were writing about math, writing clearly was much, much more important than injecting your voice or sounding pretty. – Kevin Oct 13 '13 at 6:27
According to OED, this word is now commonly used (as in this case) in a sarcastic sense. – user49727 Oct 13 '13 at 14:01
up vote 6 down vote accepted

It is an entirely positive word. An attempt to sound affectedly erudite, on the other hand -- that is bad.

share|improve this answer
Does everyone have to sound affectedly erudite, before they are really erudite? – Tim Oct 13 '13 at 3:47
Well... No. You can simply not be conscious of your voice, and perhaps your erudition will shine through naturally. – Ernest Friedman-Hill Oct 13 '13 at 3:50
+1 I concur. If one were attempting "to sound affectedly erudite," I would instead refer to that person as being pedantic. Merriam-Webster's definition is my personal favorite: ostentatiously learned. – Lumberjack Oct 13 '13 at 4:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.