Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Which is the correct sentence?

It is much more simple to resolve the memory leak issues.

It is much more simpler to resolve the memory leak issues.

share|improve this question
Much simpler or much more simple. One or the other, not both. –  John Lawler Oct 7 '13 at 16:53
"More" provides the comparative degree. With more you don't need simpler. This question is better suited to ELL. –  Andrew Leach Oct 7 '13 at 16:54
Where hopefully you'll be directed to a reference such as here –  Edwin Ashworth Oct 7 '13 at 16:59
add comment

closed as off-topic by Andrew Leach, FumbleFingers, p.s.w.g, Kristina Lopez, user49727 Oct 7 '13 at 19:12

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. A list of these references can be found here: List of general references" – Andrew Leach, FumbleFingers, p.s.w.g, Kristina Lopez, user49727
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

You may say either "more simple" or "simpler", but both together are redundant.

share|improve this answer
Thank you very much! –  dexterous Oct 7 '13 at 16:58
Thank you very more mucher! (Or is is much morer?) –  bib Oct 7 '13 at 18:10
add comment

Although it would be somewhat correct to say more simple, simpler is a better option.

Check this N-gram graph.

share|improve this answer
Are you saying that simpler is somewhat more correct? –  Edwin Ashworth Oct 7 '13 at 17:01
Well I'm not sure about that since I'm not a native speaker but most of the times it's better to go with more common things. –  Zafer Cesur Oct 7 '13 at 17:05
Nice riposte, Zafer. –  Edwin Ashworth Oct 7 '13 at 17:08
Just don’t go with too many commoner things—the commoner might come after you, wanting them back! –  Janus Bahs Jacquet Oct 7 '13 at 17:29
N-grams say nothing about correctness. Like logic, you can't discover anything with them unless you've already discovered it without them. –  John Lawler Oct 7 '13 at 18:08
show 2 more comments

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.