Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A colleague of mine found reference to the word "Exgest" in a contract. In context, this appeared to mean the opposite of the word "Ingest" which was used earlier in the contract. These words were intended to convey the consumption and processing of data in a system.

Does this word, "Exgest", actually exist, and what does it mean?

Edit:
List of prior research:
google: exgest
google: word definition exgest
google: site:dictionary.com exgest
reverse lookup: opposite of ingest
merriam webster search: exgest
dictionary.com exgest
english.stackexchange.com search

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 6 down vote accepted

The proper antonym of ingest is egest not exgest. Etymologically e- serves the same purpose as ex-.

egest

To discharge or excrete from the body.

share|improve this answer
    
So then the word "exgest" does not exist? –  funkymushroom Oct 1 '13 at 19:54
    
No it doesn't. e- and ex- prefixes are similar variants and egestion sounds better and is less complicated than exgestion. –  user49727 Oct 1 '13 at 19:59
    
Thank you very much. –  funkymushroom Oct 1 '13 at 20:09
1  
Actually it does exist, but it's a proper noun. It's the trade name of a medication. Egest is 100% correct, I'm just pointing out that Exgest is technically a word, but not in the sense of your question –  John Q Public Oct 1 '13 at 20:14
1  
@JanusBahsJacquet, Au contraire, for trademark purposes something that's easy to remember and to pronounce, but not a word is a good medicine name. –  Andrew Lazarus Oct 2 '13 at 5:42
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.