Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Reading about the movie character, Dexter, a fan was wondering about how the series will end:

Why can't they have him get caught or killed?

It got me thinking..it is "have sb do smth" used here? I somehow cannot understand the usage of "get" which I can (from context) see references to passive.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

I will have him killed.

Would mean that I will arrange for someone to be killed.

He will get killed.

Would mean that some circumstances would lead to someone's death.

Now, in terms of how we would talk about the real world, "I will have him get killed" would be strange and unwieldly - just about justifiable, but pretty bad phrasing.

In talking about producers of fiction (specifically, the writers of Dexter in this case), there is a remove between the effect of characters upon characters - such as say a policeman character who kills Dexter - and the writers who have control over the circumstances Dexter encounters in a way that no one does over anyone in reality. As such:

I will have him get killed.

Makes perfect sense in reference to a fiction, and means I will write the story in such a way that he gets killed.

The meaning of the quoted question

Why can't they have him get caught or killed?

Follows from that, why can't the people who produce the show write the story in such a way that he gets caught or killed?

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. Just to be sure, what form is that -"have sb do sth"? Or "have sb done"? –  user970696 Sep 17 '13 at 11:29
    
Neither. It's "have [circumstance happen]", where the circumsance is "he gets caught or killed". It's close to "have somebody do something" but with the second part of that in the passive. –  Jon Hanna Sep 17 '13 at 11:35
    
Thanks, if you could give me a reference for this usage (Oxford dictionary would be the best) I will be so grateful! I have never heard about such an usage of "have". –  user970696 Sep 17 '13 at 11:39
    
Have here is being used in the sense "cause to be in a particular state or condition" as at oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/have the unusual construction relates to the unusual degree of control a fiction writer has over fictional characters, we would normally say "I will have him killed" because if we are in a position to arrange a killing we do so through the murderer not through setting up a whole series of circumstances like writers do for characters. –  Jon Hanna Sep 17 '13 at 11:47
    
@JonHanna: There is a difference between have a fictional character get killed and have somebody (fictional or otherwise) killed, but I think it isn't that we do the second more often than the first. That certainly does not apply to me, though your experience may differ. –  TimLymington Sep 17 '13 at 12:19
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.