Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it

He had more experience than I, he having produced more than 10 songs already.

or

He had more experience than I, him having produced more than 10 songs already.

The latter sounds more natural to me, but the former seems more grammatically consistent—alas I don't know what the parts are called to delve further. The questions Is "all that he have" correct? and "He have a point" is this correct? were all I could find and didn't seem specifically relevant, AFAICT.

share|improve this question
1  
neither. Having produced more than 10 songs already, he had more experience than I - or He had more experience than I, having produced less than his 10 songs –  mplungjan Sep 16 '13 at 7:53
2  
@mplungjan, your second example does not make sense. The participle modifies the subject of the sentence, so it would mean that he had produced less than his own ten songs. “He had more experience than I/me, having produced more than ten songs already” is fine. –  Janus Bahs Jacquet Sep 16 '13 at 9:22
    
Ok, I was not sure. Thanks for the correction –  mplungjan Sep 16 '13 at 9:42

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Young's Literal Translation of the Bible contains:

[Luke 15]: 13 `And not many days after, having gathered all together, the younger son went abroad to a far country, and there he scattered his substance, living riotously; 14 and he having spent all, there came a mighty famine on that country, and himself began to be in want...

But I'd agree that the inclusion of the 'he' is archaic (not 'wrong!') here.

However, I wouldn't quibble about the following example (B) of the usage:

(A) John and Jennie each had more experience than I / me, John (for instance) having produced more than 10 songs already.

...

(B) John and his sister each had more experience than I / me, he having produced more than 10 songs already.

(Add the 'for instance' in A / B if you wish - it's logical.)

share|improve this answer
    
In your examples with two people, where the pronoun disambiguates, it is natural enough. In the asker’s examples, though, I find it unnatural in contemporary English. –  Janus Bahs Jacquet Sep 16 '13 at 9:21
1  
Yes. I thought I'd covered that. Though OP queried the grammaticality rather than the idiomaticity. –  Edwin Ashworth Sep 16 '13 at 10:41
    
Thank you for finding that passage. The use of "he" actually doesn't sound too archaic to me, and this is for my own writing, so with the vote of confidence (that "he" isn't wrong), I think I'll use "he." –  Andrew Cheong Sep 18 '13 at 7:16

This is a gerund phrase, so the usual recommendation is actually possessive:

…his having produced…

However, I usually hear the object form (me/you/him/her/us/them) in speech:

…without me being aware…

In your specific case, though, I would omit the pronoun altogether:

He had more experience than I, having produced more than 10 songs already.

share|improve this answer
    
The usual recommendation, in my opinion, is 'use the form that achieves the meaning or emphasis you want': I didn't see him dancing just states the fact you didn't see him performing (he may not have danced); / I didn't see his dancing states the fact that you missed his routine. Both are perfectly grammatical. The first variant of dancing lies nearer the verbal end of the spectrum, the second nearer the nounal. –  Edwin Ashworth Sep 16 '13 at 12:40
    
@JonPurdy - Thanks for the suggestion; that's actually where I started, but wasn't satisfied with the (syntactic) ambiguity of who "produced more than 10 songs already." –  Andrew Cheong Sep 18 '13 at 7:11

My suggestions as answer instead of comment with correction

Neither. The first, albeit possibly correct, sounds weird/archaic

  • Having produced more than 10 songs already, he had more experience than I

  • He had more experience than I, having produced more than 10 songs already.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks; your second suggestion is where I started, but I wasn't satisfied with the (syntactic) ambiguity of who "produced more than 10 songs already." I do like your first suggestion. –  Andrew Cheong Sep 18 '13 at 7:12

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.