Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

In reading a curriculum vitae, I noticed an author used both

  • 2013 M.A. of Information Science

and

  • 2008 M.A. in Philosophy.

Is there any logic to this? Which one should be preferred for academic cv's?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by JeffSahol, TrevorD, Mari-Lou A, Kristina Lopez, Brian Hooper Sep 9 '13 at 20:33

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

2  
You might have a look here. –  Brian Hooper Sep 9 '13 at 9:08
    
I also wonder what kind of guidance you would have received at Academia (but please don't cross-post). –  J.R. Sep 9 '13 at 9:28
add comment

1 Answer 1

In my neck of the woods (NAmer) I've only ever heard M.A. in. The reason is that M.A. is usually expanded in English as Master of Arts, and Master of Arts of Information Science or Master of Arts of Philosophy is wrong, because the second thing is part of the first (philosophy is part of the arts) and not the other way around.

It all gets pretty complicated pretty quickly. Philosophy is actually more in the humanities than in the arts, but you can't even say 'philosophy is a humanity', because humanity is never singular in that sense.

My advice is to stick to the standard jargon, which is 'in.'

share|improve this answer
1  
It may also depend on what the awarding institution uses (although in is far more widespread. There may be no institution which uses of for the reason you state). –  Andrew Leach Sep 9 '13 at 9:09
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.