Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am just interested in finding another word for sentence finisher in English, or basically someone who has a habit of cutting off another person's sentence and putting in their own statement.

share|improve this question
    
The word for a person who is forever interrupting is rude. –  tchrist Jul 22 '13 at 23:02
    
That's true, but you can be rude for doing many different things. I am just looking for one that is for cutting people's sentences off. –  Michael Lai Jul 22 '13 at 23:06
    
You won’t find it. –  tchrist Jul 22 '13 at 23:08
    
Why would you want “a single word”? It’s quite clear when you use more than one word. –  tchrist Jul 23 '13 at 1:30
    
@tchrist - Curiosity I guess... and you always want more than one way to say something because it might be more appropriate in different settings. –  Michael Lai Jul 23 '13 at 1:33
add comment

5 Answers

There's "buttinsky", though that's really about getting into other people's business. Maybe you could repurpose it.

share|improve this answer
add comment

While not a single word, and without any history of use in this context, consider the term conversational usurper, where usurp means

to seize, take over, or appropriate (land, a throne, etc) without authority

share|improve this answer
add comment

I think you mean someone who appropriates your point. If you are making a point and another person breaks in to give his own interpretation of what you are trying to say, he has appropriated your point or your response. Often, the explanation used by an interrupter who takes over the sentence is not in keeping with what the speaker had in mind. That person has appropriated your argument and turned it to his own purpose. You see this in informal political debate sometimes.

share|improve this answer
    
Well, someone who finishes a sentence for someone else can either be saying exactly what the other person was trying to say (maybe they just want to get to the end) or something that the other person wasn't trying to say (which is what you are pointing out). It would be even better to distinguish between the two, but that would be just making things even more difficult. –  Michael Lai Jul 23 '13 at 6:35
add comment

Since Merriam Webster defines "interrupter" (or "interruptor") as "one that interrupts" and, the same dictionary, defines "interrupt" (verb) as "to stop or hinder by breaking in 'interrupted the speaker with frequent questions'", you can use "interrupter" (or "interruptor").

Incidentally, you'll find the example sentence that Merriam Webster reports fits the case in the question.

To further illustrate its usage, consider "Interrupters might also just be excited or eager to make their point." (CBS NEWS)

share|improve this answer
    
Is interruptor specific enough? It would apply to any action that someone was undertaking, but not specifically to speech. –  Michael Lai Jul 23 '13 at 0:28
add comment

Not a single-word answer but that's because there are none, excluding "interrupter" which kinda gets the message across.

to butt in Verb phrase: butt in, to meddle in the affairs or intrude in the conversation of others; interfere: It was none of his concern, so he didn't butt in.

Macmillan defines butt in as: to join a conversation or activity without being asked to

Neologic solution: a "buttsome" or "buttical" person. (a shame these adjectives do not exist)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.