English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If this were a mere tagline, not a complete sentence in a full paragraph, which would be more correct?

  1. Committed to build a better world
  2. Committed to building a better world
share|improve this question
Your question is not quite clear. What aspect are you questioning? What is the alternative? (By the way, the phrase you offer is not a complete sentence.) – bib Jul 8 '13 at 13:38
It's a tagline. That's why. – anamika1310 Jul 8 '13 at 13:55
Because it's a tagline, it's not possible to say which is "more correct" without knowing what you intend it to mean. (2) is certainly more usual, probably because it is present continuous and indicates a current activity; (1) could be construed as not having started yet. – Andrew Leach Jul 8 '13 at 14:43
@Andrew, so "to building" is present continuous and "to build" future tense? – user19148 Jul 8 '13 at 16:54
If the tagline were to be used as advertising for an architectural firm, I'd say number two is better. If the firm is known for its award-winning green designs, for example, "Committed to building a better world" just has a better ring to it than "Committed to build a better world." IMHO. – rhetorician Jul 9 '13 at 0:58

The meanings are slightly different. I understand it as

  1. "Being" committed "in order to" build a better world.
  2. Committed to "the task of" building a better world.

Of course, being a tagline, nobody really cares. The first impression meanings are about the same.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.