English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Sorry if this is a stupid question to ask here, but I don't have much formal knowledge of grammar.

I just want to know if "I went to jog" is grammatical, and if so, are there any differences between "I went to jog", "I went for a jog", and "I went jogging"?

share|improve this question

closed as general reference by MετάEd, Kris, Kristina Lopez, aedia λ, Hellion Jun 12 '13 at 22:06

This question is too basic; it can be definitively and permanently answered by a single link to a standard internet reference source designed specifically to find that type of information.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

You might find ELL a more suitable site for your needs. For example I recently answered a similar (not identical) question to yours.. – Mari-Lou A Jun 10 '13 at 21:17

All three are perfectly grammatical. Although the grammatical function the word jog / jogging is different in each case, they all have essentially the same meaning.

A speaker will probably favor one construction over the others, depending on the speaker's native dialect.

share|improve this answer
To my native ear, "I went for a jog" and "I went jogging" are natural constructions. "I went to jog" is the odd one out. It is more like "Q. Why did you go to the park? A. I went to jog." If I asked somebody "Hey, what did you do this afternoon?" and they said "I went jogging" or "I went for a jog" I might leave it at that. If they said "I went to jog" however, I would most probably ask "Oh? Where did you go?" because it would sound like they went somewhere in particular for the purpose of jogging upon arrival. – mikeY Jun 10 '13 at 20:52
Thanks! If you have time, can you explain more on how a speaker's native dialect can influence preference for one of those phrases? – Piper Nanook Jun 10 '13 at 20:52
I went to jog has two senses for me. One is the purpose infinitive sense that mikeY mentions; the other is an idiom for an aborted action: I went to jog, but someone had stolen my jockstrap. – John Lawler Jun 10 '13 at 22:00

There is nothing ungrammatical about "I went to jog", though it is not as colloquial as the other two. They all mean essentially the same thing. If you wanted to make a fine distinction, you could say that "a jog" is for some (understood) distance or time, while "jogging" is just the idea of jogging without any specific time/distance.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.