Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 6 down vote favorite
1

Now, I never do this, but in some few cases I have seen people use multiple exclamation (or question) marks like this:

Hey!!!

Is that grammatically correct? (Or just okay). In case it is, how many marks are grammatically allowed/accepted?

share|improve this question
4  
@kiamlaluno: Nah, I am not asking about ordering the usage of two punctuation marks. I am asking about the quantity to be used when reiterating just one (and if it is allowed in the first place). – Omega Feb 7 '11 at 0:13
1  
The answer you will get is probably the same the other question has got. A sentence has just a single terminal punctation mark, and the use of multiple [question|exclamation] marks is done for emphasis. – kiamlaluno Feb 7 '11 at 0:40
2  
Never!!!!!!!!!! – onomatomaniak Dec 8 '11 at 7:20
It is not grammar it is punctuation...??? – GEdgar Dec 8 '11 at 13:47
show 1 more comment

7 Answers

up vote 24 down vote accepted

'Multiple exclamation marks,' he went on, shaking his head, 'are a sure sign of a diseased mind.'

-- Eric, Terry Pratchett

More on this subject on the Discworld and Pratchett Wiki.

It's just for added emphasis. I do not believe it is strictly grammatically correct, but then using ALLCAPS is not, but people do that too, emphasis once again.

share|improve this answer
4  
Only because it is so difficult to introduce nuance into written text, and speech relies so heavily on nuance. – jcolebrand Feb 7 '11 at 0:35
@drachenstern: Entirely, I use all manner of creative embellishments in my writing, particularly when chatting to someone online. Emphasis is not innately wrong, but when punctuation gets involved, can breach standard grammatical rules. – Orbling Feb 7 '11 at 0:38
6  
+1 for quoting Terry Pratchett:-) – Tragicomic Feb 7 '11 at 13:12
1  
Emphasis. Okay =D – Omega Feb 10 '11 at 0:56
up vote 18 down vote

It's fine in informal communication, email, poetry, and advertising headlines. Three would be most common. Two, four, or more is rarer.

It's never "officially" correct. The people who write books about how punctuation should be used in English tolerate only two levels of enthusiasm: not enthusiastic and enthusiastic. The idea that somebody might be very enthusiastic is too alarming to contemplate.

share|improve this answer
2  
The problem is that repeating the same punctuation only reiterates the same level of enthusiasm. It does not indicate a greater level of enthusiasm any more than "enthusiasm enthusiasm enthusiasm" does. – Dour High Arch Feb 7 '11 at 2:17
3  
Please don't lump poetry in with email and advertising headlines. Joel, you're killin' me!!!!!! – Robusto Feb 7 '11 at 2:26
1  
+1 for a generally informative answer and a wonderful rundown of the “official” standard. You remind me of Lord Neeves’ lovely A lyric for Saturday Night: “… We can't for a certainty tell // What mirth may molest us on Monday; // But, at least, to begin the week well, // Let us all be unhappy on Sunday. // …” – PLL Feb 7 '11 at 4:50
11  
In conventional English punctuation, a drowning man shouts "Help!". Given this, what can one infer about the mental state of someone who writes "Hi!!!!!"? :-) – ShreevatsaR Feb 7 '11 at 7:21
2  
A google search has shown that exactly 9 exclamations points have never appeared, but 8 and 10 have. The research on 15 and above has not been completed yet. – Mitch Nov 6 '11 at 22:50
show 3 more comments
up vote 15 down vote

Never.

At least not for grammatical purposes. More than one exclamation mark doesn't have any meaning. An exclamation doesn't get more "exclamationy" by more marks.

Of course, you could still use them, but the interpretation would be entirely up to the reader. Use of punctuation that doesn't have any grounds in grammar would be more like decoration.

I've seen people invent their own style of punctuation,,,like tripple commas,,,but that of course doesn't have any meaning either,,,it mostly makes the person look unstable...

Multiple exclamation marks are sometimes seen in leetspeek, often intermixed with intentional mistakes in the form of 1, one or eleven:

pwnd!!!!11!!111!one!!eleven!!!!

share|improve this answer
1  
"exclamationy" → exclamatory? – Jon Purdy Feb 7 '11 at 1:04
"intentonal" → "intentional"? – kiamlaluno Feb 7 '11 at 6:24
@kiamilaluno: Thanks, that was a typo. (Strange, this is the only forum I ever encountered where pointing out typos isn't considered rude... ;) – Guffa Feb 7 '11 at 7:06
1  
@downvoters: Why the downvote? If you don't explain what you think is wrong, it can't improve the answer. – Guffa Feb 7 '11 at 7:12
1  
I didn't down vote this answer, and I think the down vote should be explained. Maybe it is because the sentence containing punctuation,,,like is not clearly marked as example, and who (partially) read the answer understood you were saying that is a correct use of the commas. Of course, I cannot say that is the exact reason. – kiamlaluno Feb 7 '11 at 9:14
show 2 more comments
up vote 3 down vote

One is enough to convey your feelings in conventional English but people seem to be taking it symbolically to mark the full intensity of their emotion and playing with it sometimes putting more than three exclamatory marks for a simple wish; However, we do not take care of it when it comes to conversation.

share|improve this answer
up vote 2 down vote

"Keep your exclamation points under control. You are allowed no more than two or three per 100,000 words of prose. If you have a knack of playing with exclaimers the way Tom Wolfe does, you can throw them in by the handful." (Elmore Leonard)

share|improve this answer
up vote 0 down vote

Punctuation isn’t grammar. Where and how often you use exclamation marks and how many you use at any one time is a matter of stylistic judgement. There will rarely be a need for any at all in an academic paper. If, on the other hand, you’re writing the captions and speech bubbles for a comic strip, let your maxim be, the more the better.

share|improve this answer
I don't think of punctuation as grammar either but school teachers, students, and copy editors probably wouldn't make much of a distinction since they would change things either way. As to number of marks, that most likely is a rule in the rule books, which most take to be the rules of grammar. – Mitch Nov 6 '11 at 22:47
2  
@Mitch: Most linguists consider grammar to be morphology and syntax. If you extend the term much wider it becomes meaningless. On the point of substance, exclamation marks are indeed most effective when they are few and far between - in formal writing. But much, possibly most, writing isn't formal. I gave the example of a comic strip. Another is computer mediated communication, where multiple exclamation marks, alongside emoticons and other signs, can support the writer's intention in the way that paralanguage does in speech. – Barrie England Nov 7 '11 at 9:24
up vote 0 down vote

No. Stop. Period. End. That's it.
Do all those extras add to the meaning that I say No and no more than that, grammatically?
Same with exclamation marks, I guess. Or else it would undermine the power of the Wonder mark.

share|improve this answer
1  
From my experience, I have come to recognize the use of more than one consecutive ! or ? as coming from a teenager, who is also not a serious student of English. – Kris Dec 8 '11 at 6:43

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.