English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

For example:

I did not respond physically

I did not physically respond

I can't escape the sense that #2 'strongly' leaves open the possibility (or implies) that the writer responded some way other than physically.

Whereas, #1 seems to rule out physical response and does not imply some other form of response.

Maybe it's just me, or am I describing something that's been analyzed before (and perhaps given a name)

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by FumbleFingers, MετάEd, Kristina Lopez, jwpat7, aedia λ Jun 11 '13 at 20:41

This question was marked as an exact duplicate of an existing question.

In your particular case it probably doesn't really make much difference - except that in the vast majority of cases, we'd follow the normal verb+adverb sequence. In something like "I spoke definitely" vs "I definitely spoke", there's definitely a difference. – FumbleFingers Jun 6 '13 at 2:59
It really depends on the adverb, and on the intonation as spoken. In writing, it's hard to tell what was intended. In general, if an adverb is in a less common place (like before a verb), it signals something. But what people might use it to signal is wide open, and must generally be inferred from the context and from experience with the speaker; guessed is probably a better term than inferred. Adverbs can nest in a lot of niches. – John Lawler Jun 6 '13 at 3:02
It works the other way around in "Christmas was not normally celebrated by our family" versus "Christmas was not celebrated normally by our family". Here the verb-adverb order strongly suggests that it was celebrated, but not in the normal way. – Peter Shor Jun 6 '13 at 3:03
@John Lawler, you consider adverbs places -before- their verbs to be less common than those placed after their verb? – Hal Jun 6 '13 at 10:33

From a previous question, here are some rules of thumb.

I will state that your interpretations of the two sentences are correct. I believe the interpreted end result of moving the adverb before or after the verb will vary depending on the adverb and verb in question. And I think the differences are more apparent when the sentence is negative.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.