English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I read on Gabriel Weinberg's recent blog:

"Startups are a long-term game. My best advice is to treat entrepreneurship as a career path, but it is easier said than done absent some amount of success. For me, I had a taste of it three years in and some real success six years in."

How does the grammar of in work here:
I had a taste of it three years in and some real success six years in.

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

It is the adverbial use of in to refer to a distance in a particular direction. In this case it is a distance in time, measured from the time that Gabriel Weinberg started his entrepreneurial career, so somewhat metaphorical.

in (adverb) 2. to or toward a certain place or direction: "he flies in today", "they live ten miles in". [yourdictionary.com]

share|improve this answer
To be read as "inwards of (point-in-space/ point-in-time)"? "I had a taste of it in the past under (within the last) three years and some real success in the past under (within the last) six years." Right? – Kris Jun 3 '13 at 6:35
@Kris- I'm not sure I understand your phrase with under in it. In any event it's to be read as: I had a taste of success after spending three years on the project, and some real success six years after starting the project. I don't believe it means during the first 3 years, but rather, at the 3-year mark. – Jim Jun 3 '13 at 6:55
I have to agree with Jim. @Kris, your comment only muddies the water. Under has nothing to do with the adverbial 'in' in this context. Instead, to say something happened 3 years in is the same as to say it happened 3 years into the project (or as Jim rightly states after 3 years). Thus, the in in the OP context has the same meaning as into, only into is used when there is an object, and in is used when there is not. – Darling Jun 3 '13 at 7:15
@Darling, Take your time, my comment was a question to the answerer and we need to wait for a response. Even otherwise, you could substantiate your argument if you had any. – Kris Jun 3 '13 at 7:19
@FumbleFingers Good idea. Did. – MετάEd Jun 3 '13 at 23:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.