English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What are the differences between the following?

  1. He is planning to do something.
  2. He is planning on doing something.

When to use each?

share|improve this question

The sentences are quite similar. They convey similar meanings. Without being overly technical (not that I'm capable of it), I suggest sentence number one sounds more definite than sentence two.

An appropriate comment coming after sentence one might be, for example,

"[He is planning to do something.] We are not sure what he is planning, but we know he's going to do something!"

Coming after sentence two, an appropriate follow-up comment might be,

"[He is planning on doing something.] We are not sure what he is planning, and we are not sure he will actually do it, but we are pretty sure he will at least make an attempt to do something."

In other words, sentence one is less "qualified-sounding" than sentence two.

The nonverbal aspects of the sentences, however, can affect the meaning and implication of the sentences. Let's say, for example, two people are whispering to each other in an audience that is gathered to watch a magician. The magician is on stage, and as he pauses briefly, as if to think what to do next, one person whispers to the other, with the nonverbal emphasis on the word something:

"He is planning on doing something!"

On the other hand, suppose the whisperer said, with an emphasis on the word do,

"He is planning to do something."

Which sounds more definite to you? If you say "Sentence two," you are probably well on your way to understanding the differences between the two locutions. If not, then I have failed to 'splain things well enough!

share|improve this answer

Although common usage may blur the lines, I believe "plan to" is used to communicate the plan itself, while "plan on" is used when describing the assumptions or predictions on which the plan is based or depends.

share|improve this answer

The first sounds logical because is planning shows an action going to be performed in the future, thus the first part is correct and regarding the second part, to do something is the infinitive. On the other hand, on doing something does not sound logical.

share|improve this answer

The difference is in when the plan begins and ends.

"I am planning to cross the bridge" tells you that the plan comes to its end when the bridge is crossed.

"I am planning on crossing the bridge" tells you that the plan begins once the bridge is crossed. In other words you have made a plan that can only come into operation after you have reached the other side of the bridge.

share|improve this answer
    
I don't think that's accurate. If you say, "I'm planning on going to the game on Saturday," that doesn't carry any implication that you have a specific plan that begins after you get there---just that it's a thing you intend to do. – Kelly Tessena Keck Dec 30 '14 at 13:22

Here it is, the description is from Macmillan English Dictionary:

  1. To intend to do something: plan to do sth, My boss is planning to retire at 50.
  2. to think about something you intend to build or make, and draw a picture of how it will look 'plan on' (phrasal) [plan on (doing) something] to intend to do something or expect something to happen: We are planning on going to Australia this year. We hadn't planned on so many people coming.
share|improve this answer

protected by Rathony Feb 29 at 16:54

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.