Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

On another stackexchange site, I used the following phrasing:

I want to do X. It seems I can only do so when Y.

Someone edited the second sentence:

It seems that I can only do so when Y.

This made me realise that the edited form is perhaps more common -- but is my original phrasing grammatically incorrect? What role does "that" play in the second variation?

share|improve this question
    
This has less to do with the phrase it seems than with the omission of that in general. Look up "omission of that" in Google Search. e.g., books.google.co.in/… -- englishforums.com/English/OmissionSubordinateConjunction/bhzhh/… –  Kris May 16 '13 at 12:43
    
Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/8145/14666 –  Kris May 16 '13 at 12:45
    
Ok, I now understand my real question better. But neither the other answer nor any of my google results explain the rules in terms I can understand. :( –  starwed May 16 '13 at 12:50
    
@starwed But perhaps you can rephrase the question now that you understand the issue better? –  TrevorD May 16 '13 at 12:53
    
Also @TrevorD This question is better asked on ELL it seems. –  Kris May 16 '13 at 12:54
show 7 more comments

marked as duplicate by tchrist, RegDwigнt Jan 18 at 23:25

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1 Answer

One use of the word that is as a complementizer, a part of speech that is a type of subordinating conjunction in traditional grammars. Complementizers introduce complement clauses, which are sentential clauses that may or may not stand alone and are the argument of the main verb:

  • I believe that she is a good person.
  • It seems that he can perform miracles.

In other words, the clause she is a good person (which stands alone as a valid sentence), is the argument of the verb believe. The argument of this use of believe is a complement clause, and so may optionally be introduced by the complementizer that.

When that is used as a complementizer, it is optional. Omitting or including the that complementizer is a stylistic decision. Here is a good article that can help elucidate the factors that go into the decision (also available as a podcast at the same link).

share|improve this answer
2  
Yes. A That-Complement is one of the four types of English Complement Clauses. The that is required only when the clause begins the sentence, where it's needed to mark a detour to a subordinate clause for the parser. That he was late is unfortunate vs *He was late is unfortunate. –  John Lawler May 16 '13 at 14:47
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.