Sign up ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to enter antonyms by part of speech into a database (for natural language processing) and have run into a problem with "indoors" vs "outdoors". One dictionary lists parts of speech for "outdoors" as adverb, noun, and adjective; another, as just adverb and adjective; a third, as adverb and noun.

The first dictionary lists "indoors" only as adverb; the second, as adverb and adjective; the third, only as adverb. None of them list "indoors" as a noun.

I plan on ignoring the dictionaries and entering the words as antonyms of each other as nouns, adjectives and adverbs, but before I do...

Is there really some reason that "indoors" can't be a noun? (E.g.: "My wife loves the outdoors, but I love the indoors.")

share|improve this question
"Is there some reason that indoors can't be a noun?" strikes me a a strange question. It's just not . . . people would understand you if you used it as a noun, but that is not considered a word. It makes as much sense to argue "Why isn't napkin a verb, which could mean using a napkin?" – Jeremy May 15 '13 at 20:51
@Jeremy Yet this sort of thing does happen, often with trademarks. See xeroxed in the 1960s. (I googled that.) – ghoppe May 15 '13 at 21:45
I have another one: "David Rakoff 1964-2012: Writer penned lauded, darkly comic essays" – ghoppe May 15 '13 at 21:52
You haven't mentioned the four you haven't: Davided, Rakoffed, writered and comic(k)ed. – Edwin Ashworth May 15 '13 at 22:09
What's your POS set? – John Lawler May 16 '13 at 2:19

2 Answers 2

At first I thought you had a point. But then as I thought about it, I realized that this usage (I love the indoors) is quirky. Most people would say I love staying indoors.

According to, outdoors has come to mean "open spaces" as a noun since 1857. Indoors is first attested 1799 in George Washington's writing.

Indoors simply isn't widely used by native english speakers as a noun. (Yet.)

That being said, there might be something to what you're saying. This Google Ngram clearly shows that outdoors is used as a noun far more frequently, but there are some more recent usages of the indoors that aren't purely adjectival (ie. the indoors food market) and do seem to use indoors as a noun. I suppose it remains to be seen if dictionaries pick up on this and agree that it's not just a poetic/novel turn of phrase or grammatical error.

share|improve this answer
Really? "The indoors food market"? Not "the indoor food market"? Ouch, where did you find that? – terdon May 15 '13 at 22:18
@terdon I don't recall. It's in the Ngram corpus somewhere. ;) – ghoppe May 15 '13 at 23:01
@ghoppe - Not when I searched for it (?)… – chasly from UK Oct 12 at 22:07

If you're building your own natural language processor, you may find that the classic eight parts of speech lack a sufficient level of detail and symmetry. 

Before we look at the indoors/outdoors and indoor/outdoor pairs, we should look at the more basic in/out pairing. 

"In" is a preposition.  At least, the average high school student is likely to label that word in that fashion.  It's a sensible label.  "In the box" functions as a prepositional phrase.  The preposition "in" has the object "the box".  The phrase can modify either a noun or a verb.  In ordinary usage, the phrase follows the thing that it modifies. 

If "in" is a preposition, then its antonym "out" should be a preposition as well.  However, "out" doesn't behave the same as "in".  "In the box" is a perfectly natural phrase.  "Out the box" is not.*  Literate native speakers are far more likely to contrast "in the box" with "out of the box" -- a phrase which includes yet another preposition.  By itself, the word "out" doesn't evoke the same expectation of an object as "in". 

One possible solution is to consider "in" to be a transitive preposition, but to consider "out" as an intransitive preposition.  Although this lacks symmetry, it would allow your processor to anticipate prepositional objects in places where they are more likely to occur. 

Another possible solution is to ignore the classic eight entirely.  Find a brand-new way of labelling how each word functions, based on the way that the rest of your system parses text. 

Either way, the indoors/outdoors pair needs some kind of label.  These seem to be fused phrases, functioning similarly to "inside the door" and "outside of the door".  Perhaps the indoor/outdoor pair are adjectives, but the indoors/outdoors pair are adverbs and nouns.  Perhaps indoor/outdoor are leading modifiers (as in "the indoor pool") but indoors/outdoors are trailing modifiers (as in "the pool indoors"). 

Since you're making your own judgements about the grammatical function of each word in your dictionary, no; there's nothing that prevents you from labelling "indoors" as a noun.  However, there is something that keeps you from labelling it only as a noun. 

✓ Take it indoors. 
✗ Take it the car. 
✓ Take it to the car. 
✓ Take it carefully. 

The word "indoors" can modify a verb in a way that nouns on their own do not.  I can't tell you whether you need to label "indoors" as an intransitive preposition, an adverb, a trailing modifier, or anything else in particular.  I can only say that, if it is tagged as a noun, it must be given at least one more tag to account for this behaviour. 

* Ok, "out the box" is available in certain dialects and certain registers.  It's not universally rejected, but it's not universally accepted, either.  On the other hand, "out the door" is perfectly natural and might be universally accepted.  I have no idea** how your processor might handle this distinction. 

** Well, actually I have one idea.  I imagine I would render "out of the box" as an intransitive preposition modified by a prepositional phrase, and I would render "out the door" as "out [through] the door" -- an intransitive preposition followed by a prepositional phrase with an elided preposition. 

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.