English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is my edited question:

I look up in the etymological dictionay about prick, and find that prick is not a word derived from Proto-indo-european etymon.

Meanwhile, I find a lot of words meaning "prick, stick, pierce, spear, rod, etc.",

words starting with "br-"

such as brad, bristle, brittle

words starting with "st-"

such as stick, stake, stipe

and find pierce, which contains p and r, but etymologically it is composed with *per1 "forward, through" + *(s)teu-1 "To push, stick, knock, beat".

So, I start to wonder whether there is or no words derived from PIE, which starts with "pr-" and has the similar meaning to prick, such as "prick, stick, pierce, spear, rod,etc.".

share|improve this question
Can you tell us the situation that led to such a question? Why do you need such a word? How did you try to look for such a thing? Have you checked out a thesaurus already for 'prick', 'stick' or 'pierce'? – Mitch May 8 '13 at 13:50
Are you looking for "prod"? – Peter Shor May 8 '13 at 15:28
@Mitch Hi! I look up in the etymology about prick and only find that prick is not a word derived from Proto-indo-european etymon, and I start to wonder whether PIE descendants don't have any word starting with "pr-" has the similar meaning to prick – archenoo May 9 '13 at 5:41
You should include that in the question body to substantiate and give some context to the question. Edit the post. – Kris May 9 '13 at 10:58
@Kris Thanks for you suggestion and this is my edited question – archenoo May 10 '13 at 9:39
up vote 7 down vote accepted

There are quite a few.

Here's a synopsis of English simplex words beginning with PR-, an assonance that has strong phonosemantic coherence (above 70%).

It shows that there are 18 such that share a physical One-Dimensional (Extended) sense, including

prod pry prop prong prick prone pretzel

However, far more of these words (45, over 50%), refer to the Human (Social Role) sense, including

proud prior pride prep prince prance prim

This very genteel Human sense of pr- is correlated with the Human (Gender Role) senses of BR-:

Male: bris brute brawl brag brave bruise bray brawn brandish britches
Female: breast bride bra brat bread braid brood broil broth braise broad

which are anything but genteel.

share|improve this answer
It is not clear what 'One dimensional (Extended)' means with respect to 'Human (Social Role)'. Also, is there a pattern the differentiates male and female in your latter example? – Mitch May 8 '13 at 20:03
Ah, an attachment ambiguity. What correlates with the Human (Gender Role) sense in BR- is the Human (Social Role) sense in PR-. Not the 1-D Extended sense in PR-. Assonances with several phonosemantic foci are common, but the foci are normally independent, unless there's an embodied image involved. – John Lawler May 8 '13 at 21:32
@Mitch, thank you for having reminded me the phonestheme question, which was my last serious question on this site. I love it too much (or, hmmm, so much). And don't forget to upvote this great answer of John, thank you again. – user19148 May 8 '13 at 21:44
@JohnLawler: OK. I get now that social and gender roles are correlated (under 'pr-') but I stil have no idea what 1-D (extended could possibly mean. Pretzels don't really stick out in one dimension, or a prop. – Mitch May 8 '13 at 22:15
It's all explained in the paper. – John Lawler May 8 '13 at 22:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.