Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there a word to describe someone who rarely and almost never gets upset/angry? The words first came to my mind are non-confrontational and stoic, though they relate, they are not exactly what I'm looking for. The word I'm trying to look for describes a person that not only does he possesses the qualities of non-confrontational and stoicism, he basically doesn't get upset over anything whatsoever even the most upsetting situations imaginable. He is generally a pretty happy, calm and collected individual. Is there such a word exist?

share|improve this question
    
What's the problem with stoic? That's almost exactly what the word means. –  Bradd Szonye Apr 23 '13 at 22:37
2  
@BraddSzonye I don't know, stoic means he is able to suffer pain or trouble without complaining or showing what he is feeling, but I guess the word I'm trying to look for describes the person who doesn't really see pain or unpleasant situations as something unbearable or horrible, but think ordinary of it and see it as an ability or merit, so he doesn't necessarily suffer at all, but instead feel proud. I don't know, I might not be making any sense here. –  Theo Apr 23 '13 at 22:58
    
Other options include "imperturbable," "unruffled," "serene," and "impassive." –  Sven Yargs Apr 23 '13 at 22:59
    
OK, that makes sense, and while that does correspond to a certain kind of stoicism, it's probably not the usual connotation. Unflappable and imperturbable are both good. Perhaps also a phrase like "unrelentingly positive." –  Bradd Szonye Apr 23 '13 at 23:02
    
1) sanguine 2) lookup 'upset' in a thesaurus, look for its antonyms, and search there. –  Mitch Apr 23 '13 at 23:37
show 1 more comment

6 Answers 6

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Unflappable describes someone who remains composed in the face of adversity or scandal, "impossible to fluster."

Stoic has the same meaning, but often implies indifference to pleasure as well as adversity.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The state you describe is equanimity:

noun [mass noun]
calmness and composure, especially in a difficult situation:
    she accepted both the good and the bad with equanimity

[ODO]

The adjective is equanimous.

adjective
calm and composed.

[ODO]

However it would not be the best choice in normal use. Google Ngram

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
    
To avoid uses like "placid lake," I tweaked the Ngram to look for equanimous person, etc.. Turns out that equanimous is not used at all as an adjective for person, man, or woman. Placid is historically more common, but stoic overtakes it in recent years, and unflappable is about half as common. –  Bradd Szonye Apr 23 '13 at 22:58
    
This is a great example of a well-attributed posting. You put the copied-in text in a ">" section, you provide a link, and you provide the name of the provider. –  tchrist Jul 7 at 23:02
add comment

How about placid? From Merriam-Webster.com: Definition of PLACID: serenely free of interruption or disturbance

share|improve this answer
1  
Hi, and welcome to ELU! This is a good answer, although it would be better written as a statement (instead of a rhetorical question), with a link to the source you're quoting. See also How to Answer Questions. –  Bradd Szonye Apr 23 '13 at 23:18
add comment

Such a person is also cool-headed, even-tempered or self-possessed.

share|improve this answer
add comment

A word to describe a pretty happy, calm and collected individual who rarely and almost never gets upset or angry?

Consider "good-tempered" and "sweet-tempered."

share|improve this answer
add comment

Phlegmatic is another word that fits, although it fits 'stoic' better than 'happy':

From Google search definition: phlegmatic — (of a person) having an unemotional and stolidly calm disposition.

share|improve this answer
    
Where is that citation from? Please tell us the name of where you got it from, and if applicable, also a link. If you are going copy out text verbatim, our Help Center says that you must name where you got the original from, and this post fails to do that. Please see the question on meta entitled “What to do about missing source attributions: Copying, Linking, Attributions, and Plagiarism for discussion on this. –  tchrist Jul 7 at 23:03
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.