Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My boss asked me to have a look at a presentation he'll be giving next week; checking if he didn't forget anything.
While skimming over the document, the following sentence was somehow bothering me:

... in order to circuit the problem.

The use of circuit as a verb seemed odd to me. I first checked Merriam Webster's and Oxford's Learner's Dictionaries but they don't have listed circuit as a verb. The advanced editions of both dictionaries define the verb.

Neither the Corpora of Contemporary American English nor the British National Corpus has an entry on using circuit as a verb, but 10k and 2.5k, respectively, uses as a noun.

I incidentally mentioned to my boss that I'd chosen to circumvent, to handle or to deal. Subsequently, he asked a colleague who's native English whether she would understand the meaning of circuit. She agreed.

Surprisingly, she didn't say that circuit would be an odd choice. Well, I think I had posed the question in a different way, namely not asking about "being understandable" but rather about "is it natural to use circuit as a verb".

Is circuit acceptable as a verb in ordinary language or is it - as corpora are suggesting - an uncommon verb?

share|improve this question
    
More common for to circumvent is to short-circuit. –  GEdgar Apr 19 '13 at 14:09
    
@GEdgar Well, from OALD I understand something completely different to what to circuit intend to mean. –  Em1 Apr 19 '13 at 14:20
    
It is better to say “Neither . . . has” than to say “Both . . . do not have”. –  tchrist Apr 19 '13 at 14:25
    
Most likely it was intended to be either circumvent or, to a lesser extent, even short-circuit, not just circuit. –  Kris Apr 19 '13 at 14:51
2  
Or perhaps skirt (to avoid, go around the edge of, or keep distant from). –  Hellion Apr 19 '13 at 15:11
add comment

1 Answer

The OED shows that circuit has been a verb since around 1550. It derives from the same word as a noun, which is documented to have been used for around 200 years before its use as a verb. The verb means:

  1. a. trans. To go, pass, move, or travel round; to make the circuit of, compass about.
    †b. fig. To compass in thought, circumvent, get round. Obs.
  2. intr. To go or move in a circuit.

Here is a transitive example, the latest citation given:

  • 1879 R. A. Proctor Pleasant Ways Sci. v. 119
    Some..comet, circuiting the sun in about eleven years.

And here is the only intransitive citation provided:

  • a1613 T. Overbury Characters: Noble Spirit in Wks. (1856) 61
    He circuits his intents, and seeth the end before he shoot.

I would not say this is a common verb, but documentation for it certainly exists.

share|improve this answer
3  
However, circuit for circumvent (which is what the snippet appears to be saying) is marked as obsolete. –  Andrew Leach Apr 19 '13 at 11:13
    
@AndrewLeach Oh, is that what the OP was meaning? I couldn’t quite tell. –  tchrist Apr 19 '13 at 11:17
    
Well, as said in my question I also found some entries in several dictionaries. You just found another one. That's not really satisfying. –  Em1 Apr 19 '13 at 14:24
    
Is it possible - as a plain language learner - to access OED? –  Em1 Apr 19 '13 at 14:25
    
@Em1 Right now, yes. But the OED’s entry shows that the circumvent/short-circuit sense is obsolete. –  tchrist Apr 19 '13 at 14:26
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.