Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Please cite some sources to show whether the above phrase is correct or not.

share|improve this question

closed as not a real question by tchrist, Hellion, Kristina Lopez, Matt Эллен, cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 Apr 17 '13 at 15:53

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
It's idiomatic, very commonly used, and well-accepted. I would cite sources, but there are so many it's hardly worth it. You see it in news reports with regularity. –  John M. Landsberg Apr 16 '13 at 9:04
    
@JohnM.Landsberg I have a teacher who told me that the above sentence is wrong. So can you give some authoritative source/s to show that this is correct. –  Alaukik Apr 16 '13 at 10:11
    
Actually, have you tried doing the research on this phrase yourself? What are your findings, if any? –  Kristina Lopez Apr 16 '13 at 17:42
    
If you're about to leave school, you might ask the teacher to show you some authoritative source/s to show that this is not correct. The teacher probably prefers the expression 'evidence against' (equally correct, and with the more logical choice of preposition). But can you imagine a crook exclaiming "You ain't got nothin' against me, cop!"? –  Edwin Ashworth Apr 16 '13 at 22:42
1  
Alaukik, I hope you're seeing at this point that everyone agrees that the usage is standard and correct. Your teacher is just wrong, plain and simple. –  John M. Landsberg Apr 16 '13 at 23:12

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

It's idiomatic as the first responder said. Here are many examples, particularly from the early 20th century.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for these references. (And see Jim's answer with my comment.) –  John M. Landsberg Apr 16 '13 at 23:08

Be careful, Pru's examples show the phrase being used in two senses:

"After the duchesses ring was stolen, the butler was arrested with the evidence on him"

"The police picked up the suspect when the felt they had sufficient evidence on him"

share|improve this answer
    
This is correct. The references do show more than one version of this phrase, but they definitely include the usage described in the original post. –  John M. Landsberg Apr 16 '13 at 23:07

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.