English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm Russian and I don't understand this sentence:

"It was obvious that there would be no shortage of WPF books in the marketplace."

So, were there books in the marketplace (they exist) or not (a shortage takes place)?

(Thanks. I'm learning English.)

share|improve this question

closed as general reference by Kris, tchrist, Kristina Lopez, kiamlaluno, MετάEd Apr 13 '13 at 16:04

This question is too basic; it can be definitively and permanently answered by a single link to a standard internet reference source designed specifically to find that type of information.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

It means that "it was clear that there were WPF books for sale at the moment the article was written and that there would continue to be WPF books for sale in the foreseeable future". In other words, "there is no and will be no shortage of WPF books". – user21497 Apr 12 '13 at 6:43
Maybe this will help you understand: "Would be no shortage" means exactly the same thing as "would not be a shortage." – John M. Landsberg Apr 12 '13 at 6:52
Would there be a shortage of WPF books in the marketplace? No. There would be no such shortage. – Kaz Dragon Apr 12 '13 at 7:37
The phrase no shortage of usually carries with it the implication that there will be a great excess of. It is an example of understatement (2) – Brian Hooper Apr 12 '13 at 8:26
Since you are learning English, you could be interested in the English Language Learners Stack Exchange site. – kiamlaluno Apr 12 '13 at 17:22

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.