English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is a sentence in active voice: He cannot rear any cattle on his farm. Its passive would be: Any cattle cannot be reared by him on his farm? OR On his farm, any cattle cannot be reared by him? OR Any cattle cannot be reared on his farm by him? Do all the three conversions mean the same thing, does order of words have any effect on the meaning?

share|improve this question
None of these are correct. The NPI any, and its Negative trigger (can)not, are the reason. You can't just swap them around any old way -- there are syntactic rules involved besides Passive. – John Lawler Apr 8 '13 at 20:00

I would render the passive (if you put a gun to my head) as:

No cattle can be reared by him on his farm.


Cattle cannot be reared by him on his farm.

share|improve this answer
Agree about that gun to your head! But if strictly necessary (or just to satisfy the OP :-), I think your first form is slightly--just slightly--more euphonious. – jbeldock Apr 8 '13 at 22:24

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.