Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

What is the correct way to pronounce such complicated combination of sounds when not pausing for breath? As an example, how would one pronounce something like "The Eighteenth century"?

share|improve this question
    
Just as in "Henry the Sixth's throne" :-) –  Gnubie Apr 2 '13 at 19:10
add comment

marked as duplicate by Armen Ծիրունյան, Hellion, tchrist, kiamlaluno, cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 Apr 11 '13 at 2:30

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

3 Answers

up vote 9 down vote accepted

In normal speech, consonant clusters are generally simplified, because, as you point out, they're complicated and difficult to pronounce.

For instance, the pronunciation of the fractional plural sixths, as in five-sixths '5/6', is sposta be /sɪksθs/, ending in a godawful cluster of four voiceless (i.e, whispered) consonants. But nobody ever says /sɪksθs/. The /θ/ between the /s/s is simply deleted, leaving a long /s/ at the end to mark the difference between '5/6' /fayv.sɪkss/ and '5, 6' /'fayv.'sɪks/.

This is why there are contractions; the faster you talk, the more stuff you drop, not only because of pronunciation difficulties like this, but also because English is a stress-timed language, which means that there is usually the same amount of time spent between each major stress in a sentence, no matter how many unstressed syllables there are between them. In fast speech, multiple unstressed syllables are usually only a lick and a promise, if they're there at all.

In particular, the Eighteenth Century is pronounced /ðiyetinsɛnʃri/. Nobody ever notices because that's what's expected. One more reason why the article is there -- the Eighteenth Century is not 18 centuries, so we can tell the difference if they're pronounced the same.

To Repeat: English spelling does not represent English pronunciation.

share|improve this answer
1  
This is exactly what I was looking for. The discrepancy between English spelling and pronunciation makes it very hard to learn for non-native speakers. Do you know of any good reference about rules for sound combinations such as the one in /ðiyetinsɛnʃri/? –  Spatz Apr 2 '13 at 14:35
2  
Thanks for showing the palatalization on century; non-native speakers often think I’m nuts when I tell them that it occurs in words like tree. –  tchrist Apr 2 '13 at 14:37
    
@Spatz: It's still being investigated; there's a big literature on consonant cluster reduction and fast speech rules. I just transcribe what people say; I'm a grammarian, not a phonologist. –  John Lawler Apr 2 '13 at 14:44
1  
@JohnLawler Nobody ever says /sɪksθs/ ?? I do. –  Mynamite Apr 2 '13 at 22:50
1  
No. I was suggesting, no doubt way too obliquely, that what you think you say (whatever that is, hearing it from the inside) may in fact not be what others hear you say (whatever that is, hearing it from the outside). –  John Lawler Apr 4 '13 at 23:43
show 2 more comments

There is no change. Those both sound just like if the two words were said in isolation.

I don’t know why you think there might be a change, nor why you consider that a “complicated combination of sounds”. Native speakers would not.

On the other hand, one common pronunciation of months suppresses the th, so maybe that is what you have been hearing. Children are known to sometimes say moss for moths, but they eventually correct this lest they be perceived as having a speech defect.

A following sibilant does not neutralize an earlier fricative, at least in careful speech. In fact, phonemic voicing is maintained in noun–verb or in possessive–plural pairs like:

  • cloths, clothes
  • breaths, breathes
  • mouths, mouthes
  • wolf’s, wolves
  • calf’s, calves
  • house’s, houses
  • moth’s, moths

In the first word of each pair above, that word ends in two unvoiced sounds, whereas in the second word of each pair, it ends in two voiced sounds. Sometimes this is (somewhat) reflected in the spelling, but often it is not.

As I mentioned in comments, you should practice correctly saying fifths, sixths, twelfths until you have it down pat. Then once that’s done, you can then proceed to

The sixth sick sheik’s sixth sheep’s sick.

Which is surely one of the most pleasurable phrases in the English language. :)

Ok, I’m just kidding. These can be hard for anybody. But in careful speech, they can certainly be done. Very, very careful speech, perhaps, but not impossible.

share|improve this answer
    
So, are you saying that it is possible to pronounce the fricative dental sound θ (or ð) and the fricative alveolar sound s without putting a vowel in the middle? That sounds very hard to me but I am not a native speaker! –  Spatz Apr 2 '13 at 14:10
    
@Spatz Yes, one can certainly do so. Practice saying fifths, sixths, twelfths until you have it down pat. Once that’s done, you can then procede to The sixth sick sheik’s sixth sheep’s sick, surely one of the most pleasurable phrases in the English language. –  tchrist Apr 2 '13 at 14:13
1  
@tchrist: That's torture. You are evil :) –  Jim Apr 2 '13 at 14:21
    
@tchrist It is a shame it is not possible to attach sound recordings here! :) –  Spatz Apr 2 '13 at 14:24
    
Even native speakers often leave out some of the consonants in sixths. –  Peter Shor Apr 2 '13 at 14:46
show 1 more comment

How people elide sounds in consonant clusters is a very idiosyncratic thing. It varies greatly by region, and even within a region some people (e.g., those who want to sound educated) are more careful about not dropping consonants than others are. You won't find a consensus.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.