Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was browsing Area 51 and I saw this comment:

I'm just calling a spade, a spade.

I'm never quite sure how to punctuate sentences like these where a phrase is repeated back to back, without any other words to separate them. Not putting punctuation feels weird, but so does adding a comma. Neither intuitively read like I would say them in a conversation.

With a comma, I would pause before reading the second "a spade"; without punctuation, the inflexion in my voice would be off.

So, is "I'm just calling a spade, a spade." properly punctuated?

share|improve this question
    
By the way - is this a common saying in English? I know it is in Norwegian, but when I see it here in English, it looks strange... –  awe Feb 2 '11 at 13:45
1  
@awe: It is common. –  Borror0 Feb 2 '11 at 13:51
    
@awe. Cecily Cardew: When I see a spade, I call it a spade. Gwendolin Fairfax: I am glad to say I have never seen a spade. It's obvious our social spheres have been widely different. –  TRiG Aug 5 '11 at 0:59
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 14 down vote accepted

You don't need the interposing comma. Just say

I'm just calling a spade a spade.

The Subaru commercials get this awkwardly wrong:

It's what makes a Subaru, a Subaru.

No comma needed there either.

Compare the idea using two other nouns.

I'm calling a spade a shovel.

You would never use a comma there. And just because the nouns are the same doesn't change the sentence structurally.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for Subaru getting it awkwardly wrong. There was another recent marketing campaign that did it wrong too, though I can't remember which. –  nohat Feb 1 '11 at 23:03
2  
I seem to recall that pre-1900-or-so texts used this sort of comma a lot more frequently. Perhaps it's just a style thing that's recently fallen out of favour? Not at all sure how to search for it, though. –  Jon Purdy Feb 1 '11 at 23:57
    
I don't agree with the Subaru comment. After all, it's an ad, and they can say or write whatever they want. Granted, the comma is not at all needed, but I would argue that is there simply for effect. It actually makes the line more powerful and it forces the reader to pause at "Subaru"! I think it's a particularly great line and it would have been completely boring without the comma. –  Jimi Oke Feb 2 '11 at 2:25
    
It's boring with or without the comma, and if it is there just for effect I think the effect is underwhelming. Like most ad slogans. But hey, YMMV. This Ad's For You. –  Robusto Dec 1 '12 at 12:24
add comment

You don't use a comma. I agree it looks weird, but there is no pause or separation of ideas.

"I'm just calling a spade a spade" is the correct punctuation.

share|improve this answer
    
Robusto beat me to it. –  Spyplane Feb 1 '11 at 20:24
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.