Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am updating my curriculum vitae, and there is a section where I list my experience with several technologies and programming languages. I would like to group my experience in two categories; namely, technologies with which I have long experience, and those with which I have relatively basic (yet, not elementary) experience.

Currently I am listing my experience as follows:

  1. 20+ years of experience with X and Y
  2. Some experience with W and Z

However, some experience sounds ambiguous and I think gives the impression that my experience with W and Z is quite elementary. I do have some experience with W and Z but not enough to call it "broad". What would be a good or proper qualifier for such skills?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It depends on the nature of your experience:

  • You could measure it in years, just like the rest of your experience.
  • I've seen people use small bar graphs for each skill to indicate how well they know each ability.
  • You could reword your other items and say you have substantial experience with them and just experience with the lesser-known items.
  • You could say you have working knowledge of the lesser-known items.
share|improve this answer
    
I feel that the last two is most relevant here. In years could be misleading (as an example, I have longer experience with C++ than VB, but I have by far more experience with VB, because that is what I have mainly worked with. I have only done some occational bug fixing in C++) –  awe Feb 2 '11 at 13:55

You could say:

Moderate experience with W and Z

or switch it up a little:

Sound working knowledge of W and Z

which implies that you know enough to be useful in most practical cases.

share|improve this answer
    
I like "moderate experience". Thanks! –  user815423426 Feb 1 '11 at 15:52

I would recommend the following:

Experience with X and Y.

Exposure to W and Z.

However, you may want to up the scale a bit, in which case I would suggest

Expertise in X and Y.

Experience with W and Z.

This indicates that while you do have experience/working knowledge (more so than "exposure" would imply), you have not mastered the technologies/languages. It's made clearer by the use of "Expertise" with X and Y, since, if you were as skilled with W and Z as with X and Y, you would have called that "expertise" as well.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.