Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For example, I've heard nonsenses, but I've never heard bullshits.

Why one is plural and the other is singular? They mean the same thing.

share|improve this question
4  
Bullshits is nonsense –  SmokerAtStadium Mar 26 '13 at 13:53
1  
Nonsense is a singular non-count noun. It isn't used in plural form. If you heard it, it was a mistake. If there's a contrived context in which it can be used in plural form, it's strictly an outlier & can be summarily dismissed as an inconsequential freak. –  user21497 Mar 26 '13 at 14:27
1  
@BillFranke Um, are there any non-singular "non-count" nouns? –  tchrist Mar 26 '13 at 14:32
1  
@Raghav: Bullshit! I'll stand with the Macmillan Dictionary online. I said right here in this forum a month or two or three ago that I didn't trust Wiktionary. My grandmother used to repeat that old cliche "Believe nothing you hear and only half of what you read". I will add to that another cliche: Don't believe everything you see on the Internet. –  user21497 Mar 26 '13 at 14:38
2  
@tchrist: 'troops' - a single infantryman is never referred to as 'a troop'. –  Mitch Mar 26 '13 at 20:15

1 Answer 1

From the perspective of plural of bullshit

It is so because bullshit is considered to be uncountable. [reference link]

But also consider this that their exists a word bullshits.

Bullshits >> Third-person singular simple present indicative form of bullshit. [reference link]

As far as nonsense is considered, it is usually uncountable [reference link] and the plural for it is nonsenses[reference link].

Read this article in order to have a grasp of nouns which can be either countable or uncountable

share|improve this answer
    
And what about nonsense? Are senses countable? –  Jim Thio Mar 26 '13 at 13:58
2  
@JimThio: Senses are one thing, but nonsense is quite another. –  user21497 Mar 26 '13 at 14:29
    
So there is no such thing as nonsenses either. Only nonsense? –  Jim Thio Mar 27 '13 at 0:38
    
yes, nonsenses exists only in few places and that too not widely supported. Above also the wikitonary links only says it is usually uncountable. –  Raghav Mar 27 '13 at 6:29

protected by tchrist Jul 2 at 2:54

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.