Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

Whenever I write ok the spell checkers underline it with a red line and suggest that I should OK. Not even Ok works. Why is this so?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by TimLymington, coleopterist, tchrist, Kristina Lopez, RegDwigнt Mar 22 '13 at 21:42

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

It’s a bug in your spellchecker. Just add the word to your dict list. –  tchrist Mar 22 '13 at 14:31
@tchrist well its in Gmail. So its not my spell checker –  Aman Deep Gautam Mar 22 '13 at 16:58
If its gmail, that's most likely your web browser doing the spellcheck, not Google. –  T.E.D. Nov 26 '13 at 19:37
@tchrist: Since this is english.SE, I'll be that guy...It's not a bug when a word isn't in the list, and in this case, it might even be absent for a reason. See the answer on the original, and upvote it! –  Nick Stauner Jan 29 '14 at 8:27

3 Answers 3

up vote 5 down vote accepted

OK is Ok, and Ok is OK.

Oh, also Oklahoma is OK. That's its USA postal code, so it's possible that your spell-checker is agnostic on the subject, and just thinks you are trying to use the state of Oklahoma in an address.

I upvoted @camelbrush's answer because it provides a good explanation of the logic behind why some folks prefer to capitalize both letters. However, nobody is really sure where this word came from. Wikipedia has a table of around 30 of the more popular theories (from 13 different languages).

Realistically one just has to accept that both are in common use, and neither is provably "wrong". If the uncertainty really bugs you, just use the word "Okay" instead.

share|improve this answer
Here are a few other theories : thefictiondesk.com/blog/ok-or-okay –  camelbrush Mar 22 '13 at 15:46
Here's a theory that "ok" and "Ok" are not OK. +1 for the link to Wikipedia's proposed etymologies though! Too much false certainty going around on this question. –  Nick Stauner Jan 29 '14 at 8:30
I think it is problematic that there are two different accepted answers to this question on these boards (as Nick Stauner remarks, the question that this one is marked as a duplicate of, has an accepted answer saying that "OK" is the only valid spelling). I am inclined to disagree with T.E.D.: Although there are competing theories as to the origin of "OK", most (or all?) of them agree that it is an initialism, in which case all style guides seem to agree it should be uppercase. The only argument for "ok" is the descriptivist one: People do use it. –  Nagel Jul 31 '14 at 10:30
@Nagel - Not true. Of the three theories that Wikipedia bothered to explain out on their main Okay page (helpfully liked above), only one is an abbreviation. Not that I think that matters much. The question is about practice, not history. In practice, there is no authoritative answer, and both can be (and are) used. –  T.E.D. Jul 31 '14 at 11:40
@Nagel - Oh, and as for there being two "disagreeing" answers on supposedly "exact duplicate" questions, that's perhaps at least partially because the questions aren't in fact exact duplicates. This question is asking about capitalization, while the other was asking if there was any difference in meaning between the various forms found in the wild. The problem there IMHO is with folks who are overanxious to close questions, not with either answer. God save us all from the chaos that will ensue when some helpful person decides to merge the answers in these 2 supposedly "identical" questions. –  T.E.D. Jul 31 '14 at 11:49

OK is an abbreviation. This is what Oxford online dict says about its origin:

mid 19th century (originally US): probably an abbreviation of orl korrect, humorous form of all correct, popularized as a slogan during President Van Buren's re-election campaign of 1840 in the US; his nickname Old Kinderhook (derived from his birthplace) provided the initials

Now, let us look at this style guide about capitalization (Guardian Style Guide):

Use all capitals if an abbreviation is pronounced as the individual letters: BBC, VAT, etc; if it is an acronym (pronounced as a word) spell out with initial capital, eg Nasa, Nato, unless it can be considered to have entered the language as an everyday word, such as awol, laser and, more recently, asbo, pin number and sim card. Note that pdf and plc are lowercase.

Here is another style guide that suggests:

Pronounceable abbreviations
Abbreviations that can be pronounced are usually acronyms, ie, words formed from or based on the initial letters or syllables of other words, such as radar, NATO, UNESCO. These are not normally preceded by the definite article.

But then, different office suites (MS Office, Libre Office, Lotus, etc) imply these rules differently. MS Office accepts both Ok and OK.

share|improve this answer

The word is usually written OK or okay as it is a verbalization of the letters O and K, and that is simply the accepted spelling.

If I were to read ok or Ok somewhere, I would think it a misspelling of auk.

share|improve this answer
If I were to read ok or Ok somewhere, I would certainly not think it a misspelling of auk! I would think it meant OK. –  camden_kid Mar 22 '13 at 14:40
I might think of Oklahoma. –  GEdgar Mar 22 '13 at 14:41
i wonder why the down vote? cause of suggesting auk? –  camelbrush Mar 22 '13 at 14:43
@GEdgar In lowercase? At best, a typo for oak. –  choster Mar 22 '13 at 14:43

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.