Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am composing a problem for my students. It goes something like this:

You are writing a software for an observatory. You have a database of near-Earth objects that contains the following information about each object

  • name
  • category (asteroid, planet, comet, etc)
  • ...
  • the probability of impact with Earth
  • devastativeness (?) in case of impact

...

I don't seem to be able to find "devastativeness" in dictionaries. Its meaning is obvious, but I would like to use an actual word here. Any ideas?

To be explicit, I am looking for a word meaning the extent of being devastative /catastrophic.

P.S. In Russian I would use the word катастрофичность, which means "catastrophicality", exactly what I need, but google translated it as catastrophic, which can't be right.

share|improve this question
8  
The noun form is devastation, so you could say degree of devastation. –  J.R. Mar 20 '13 at 18:13
    
Just as a note, in English, one writes "a program", or "some software", or just "software", but not "a software". –  Jim Mar 21 '13 at 4:12
    
I know you already accepted an answer, but if you're wanting to focus on the harm caused, maybe aftermath would work. It is defined as "a consequence, especially of a disaster." –  JLG Mar 21 '13 at 13:22

6 Answers 6

up vote 11 down vote accepted

Destructiveness is an actual word and it seems to match your criteria.

share|improve this answer
1  
This occurred to me too but destructiveness merely indicates the ability to cause damage not the magnitude of the destruction- which is what the ask-er is looking for. –  moonstar2001 Mar 20 '13 at 17:18
1  
@moonstar2001 I think it doesn't matter in this particular case. It's similar to aptitude vs. ability. –  Chris Mar 20 '13 at 17:23

I agree with @Abody97 that destructiveness is your best bet considering the provided criteria. A less attractive option would be vehemence, which is sometimes used to describe storms.

If the criteria are flexible, you could consider something along the lines of:

  • Scale of devastation
  • Magnitude of impact
  • Intensity of impact
  • Severity

Magnitude and intensity are often used to represent the effects of events such as earthquakes, tornadoes, and cyclones.

share|improve this answer

Perhaps ironically, I think the best word here may be impact, specifically in the third sense identified in the link.

share|improve this answer
    
But impact can be positive too, can't it? –  Armen Ծիրունյան Mar 20 '13 at 17:50
    
@ArmenԾիրունյան: yes. –  Mark Bannister Mar 20 '13 at 17:52
    
Yes, it can do both. You could use "negative impact of the asteroid." I can't think of a word that implies the potential negative effects of a catastrophe. –  Ben Mar 20 '13 at 17:52
    
@Ben: But in the phrase "negative impact of the asteroid" isn't impact sort of ambiguous because when one sees impact and asteroid in one sentence, one instantly thinks of a collision... Or maybe I am imagining it –  Armen Ծիրունյան Mar 20 '13 at 17:55
    
By describing impact with "negative," it clears up most of the ambiguity, but there's still a potential that some might think otherwise. On second thought, I think "potential devastation caused by the asteroid" might be the best bet here, although that's not a single word. –  Ben Mar 20 '13 at 18:01

"Scope of impact damage" seems to cover your need for that category. You're addressing the condition that the object does achieve impact and then you're specifying the need to provide a scope of the damage.

share|improve this answer
1  
This is specifically tagged as [single-word-request], so I don't think this will work. –  mskfisher Mar 20 '13 at 20:32

If "destructiveness" feels too clumsy for whatever reason you could opt for "destructive capacity" or "devastative capacity." Seems pretty clearly to me to refer to how capable an object is of causing destruction.

share|improve this answer

"Damageability" is a term I have read in use. Or you could just use "damage in case of impact".

share|improve this answer
3  
"Damageability" refers more to the ability of an object to be damaged, not the level of damage an item is able to inflict. –  mskfisher Mar 20 '13 at 20:31

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.