English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I see sentences like

They are what is remembered.

More troops are what is going to be needed.

And got me wonderin': Can I rephrase them this way?

They are what are remembered.

More troops are what are going to be needed.

Which way is better?

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I suggest avoiding all of the forms “X is what is needed”, “X are what is needed” and “X are what are needed”. Instead, write “X is needed” (if X is singular) or “X are needed” (if X is plural), or go from passive forms to active: “We need X”. If you must aver that X is the only thing or the precise thing that's needed, write “X is all we need” or “Precisely X is all we need” or “We just need X” etc. (Use are in place of is where appropriate.)

share|improve this answer

It is always better to use active voice in sentences rather than using passive voice. The first sentence can be written as " They are what we remember." and the second sentence as "We/they(whatever it may be) are going to need more troops." So what is your opinion for this answer?

share|improve this answer
It is not always better, @Barbie. Your second sentence above is passive, for example, and it would not be improved by recasting it in the active. – John Lawler Mar 14 '13 at 18:16

They are what is remembered

Is correct

I would rephrase the other too:

More troops are what will be needed

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.