Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The word may also be used when referring to really dull signage for a government organization.

share|improve this question
2  
Are you looking for a word with a positive or negative connotation? –  advs89 Feb 3 '11 at 0:33
add comment

14 Answers

It's called boilerplate and you usually find it in government and legal documents.

share|improve this answer
    
It's actually more refering to the dullness. It's like bland or boring. –  apf Jan 31 '11 at 1:03
2  
Boilerplate is bland and boring. It's apparently designed to say as little as possible using as many words as possible. Originally it meant standardized pieces of text for use (and reuse) in official documents, but it has come to mean any dull, official prose. –  Robusto Jan 31 '11 at 1:07
2  
I'm not sure if it's quite what they are after, boilerplate in the sense described, has a connection to any text that can be reused in new contexts without being changed much from the original. Where as the question is referring to 'dull signage' - a style as opposed to documentation. –  dpmguise Jan 31 '11 at 1:29
11  
I agree with the other commenters: the primary meaning of boilerplate is still "stock text" - reusable text that can be used without much thought or effort. The fact that such text is often dull and boring is merely a side effect. –  Marthaª Jan 31 '11 at 2:11
2  
Adding to Martha, calling a specific document "boilerplate" would be incorrect (and perhaps accusatory) if the document were in fact written for a specific occasion, regardless of dullness. –  Potatoswatter Jan 31 '11 at 4:42
add comment

One possibility would be pabulum (also spelled pablum):

something (as writing or speech) that is insipid, simplistic, or bland

share|improve this answer
5  
A good word, but the meaning would be unclear to many. I'm torn between promoting the word, or 'dumbing down' with a more commonly understood alternative. –  CJM Jan 31 '11 at 12:35
    
Yep. Despite meaning simplistic, its "neoclassical" sound gives the impression of "simplistic… like the common plebeians." –  Potatoswatter Jan 31 '11 at 23:33
1  
Also reminds me of baby food. –  KitFox May 20 '11 at 12:39
add comment

Milquetoast! Such a colorful word for blandness.

share|improve this answer
5  
Two problems with this: (1) In my mind, the primary attribute of a milquetoast is timidness, with a side order of ineffectiveness; any blandness is a side effect of such a person's unwillingness to be adventurous. (2) This adjective really only works for people, not for text. –  Marthaª Jan 31 '11 at 20:09
    
(1) Yes, but blandness is the usual result of timidness. (2) I've often heard it applied to products in reviews. It would work for a story, but probably not for a government report. I think it would work for signage (street or indoor) which is supposed to be eye-catching. –  Potatoswatter Jan 31 '11 at 23:31
add comment

Perhaps prosaic or pedestrian fits the bill.

share|improve this answer
add comment

There are already a few fine candidates on this page (I like pedestrian and pablum), but I am not sure if any of them actually have the connotation of purposely.

One word that does have that connotation, at least to me, would be wishy-washy. However, I'm not sure it could be applied to "really dull signage"; I would rather call that one run-of-the-mill.

share|improve this answer
2  
Perhaps a nice alliterative phrasing would get the point across properly: "The agency insists on spoonfeeding us this purposefully pedestrian pablum ..." –  Hellion Jan 31 '11 at 17:23
add comment

As you say "really dull signage", I presume that you're looking for a negative connotation.

Stodgy, vacuous; turgid would be my favourite.

share|improve this answer
    
Stodgy means conservative, which probably fits but refers to content, not style. Vacuous means meaningless or equivocal, so probably doesn't fit. Turgid means bombastic or grandiose, which is the opposite of what we want. –  Potatoswatter Jan 31 '11 at 11:18
    
@potatos I was referring to the sense according to dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/turgid_1 : turgid adjective ( TOO SERIOUS ) /ˈtɜː.dʒɪd//ˈtɝː-/ formal (of speech, writing, style, etc.) too serious about its subject matter; boring. –  smirkingman Jan 31 '11 at 12:31
1  
I don't see how vacuous can work, even with that definition. Something may show a lot of intelligent thought and purpose, and still be written a very boring, dull and bland style. –  ShreevatsaR Jan 31 '11 at 13:01
2  
Er, are you saying that there's something wrong with picking holes in others' submissions? I thought that's what comments are for (and also the downvote feature, which I like to use sparingly). I'm adding value to the thread by reducing the potential of one of the suggested options to mislead, and by adding more information about the implications of 'vacuous'. (It would be even more value if that particular suggestion were removed, but that's not in my hands. :p) We're all here to learn. –  ShreevatsaR Jan 31 '11 at 13:57
2  
It is strange to see someone take so personally an observation about a word. :-) We are here to discuss language, too, after all… and was there anything wrong with the tone and attitude in pointing out that vacuous does not mean bland? I really meant to cause no offence; I thought I was just making an observation on the distinctness of the meanings. –  ShreevatsaR Jan 31 '11 at 14:20
show 3 more comments

I've also heard the word 'blasé' used to describe an object that was bland or boring and without any exciting or pleasurable qualities.

share|improve this answer
    
I've never come across that usage before. Are you sure you're not equating uninterested with uninteresting? One meaning of blasé is being uninterested in things because you've already had a surfeit of them. Another is sophisticated, which moves some way towards describing a person who might be considered interesting to others, even if they're not actually interested in much themselves. –  FumbleFingers May 21 '11 at 1:38
add comment

I'm going to go with insipid.

share|improve this answer
add comment

my main suggestion:
"monotonous" (which can, in fact, have a non-verbal meaning)

a few others:
"lacking personality" (which is actually two words)
"wordy" (not a word I would use, but fits the requirements)
"dull"
"needlessly redundant" (again with two words)
"emotionless" (especially the government signage part)
"professional" (sadly...)

share|improve this answer
    
"Monotonous" was also my favourite. Normally it's used for speech but I even find it evocative when used of a document. –  hippietrail May 20 '11 at 16:47
add comment

Anodyne, which strictly speaking means soothing, is often used to describe boring and/or non-commital official statements and publications.

For me at least, it carries overtones of wishing to avoid giving offense, with the (not always unintentional) side-effect of reducing both clarity and actual semantic content.

LATER - Several of the alternative proposed by others are words that can be used for OP's purpose, and to be honest OP's noun signage seems a bit too obscure to be worth looking for adjectives that do get used with that word.

But I'm still focussed on actual usage, and anodyne statement seems like a good enough variation to check. This NGram confirms it's not only used, but gaining currency by the decade.

share|improve this answer
add comment

For the connotations of lack of style but still useful:

  • utilitarian
  • spartan
share|improve this answer
    
+1 I like spartan for that purpose. Austere is another that could do the job. –  ajk May 20 '11 at 14:39
add comment

bureaucratese is more for longer stretches of words than a sign, but captures the sense of boring, like turhid and stodgy mentioned elsewhere.

share|improve this answer
    
Or use bureaucratic. –  Wayne May 20 '11 at 15:15
    
@Wayne: even though that literal change to an adjective fits the part of speech desired, the connotations of 'bureaucratic' don't seem to fit the requirements as well as 'bureaucratese'. You'd think they'd be the same but they don't feel that way. –  Mitch May 20 '11 at 16:15
add comment

Staid just means “Serious, organized, and professional; sober”, according to Wiktionary. As it makes something of a virtue out of blandness, it makes it sound like it might be intentional. Other words along these lines include sedate, temperate, moderate, and mild. But I get the feeling there is a much better one that I’m missing.

Another tack is to try words that describe things used intentionally to put people to sleep: lulling, soporific, anaesthetic.

share|improve this answer
add comment

To make a precise and pointed reference to the fact that 'it had to be dull, so it is', we resort to 'Stupidized'. May not sound politically correct, but the term has been around in the technical field.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.