Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A: How do I know if my professor is good?

B: Do you understand what he says?

A: Yes, but that might be because I'm a natural genius, and not necessarily the fact that he is good at teaching.

B: Oh, you said "the fact that he is good at teaching" - so you are already taking for granted that he is a good professor!

A: You're an idiot.

This scenario was just made up - this never actually happened to me. However, I thought it is possible nonetheless (very rare though).

Can saying "the fact that X" imply "X is a fact"? What could A say instead to prevent B from using that logic?

share|improve this question
    
A can prevent B from using that logic by preemptively saying, “Oh, I'm an idiot, I forgot he's good at teaching.” –  jwpat7 Mar 12 '13 at 1:17
1  
The usage of fact in the context is incorrect, inappropriate and unwarranted. Use fact to state what you believe is true. Say '* ... not necessarily that ...*'. ("You're an idiot." is unwarranted and inappropriate, as well.) –  Kris Mar 12 '13 at 5:32
    
This is really a logic question, and not so much about English Language and Usage. –  KitFox Mar 13 '13 at 16:14
    
Not sure why this is closed as off-topic...seems pretty clearly like a valid usage question to me. –  Kyle Strand May 14 '13 at 19:11
add comment

closed as off topic by MετάEd, tchrist, Kris, KitFox Mar 13 '13 at 16:13

Questions on English Language & Usage Stack Exchange are expected to relate to English language and usage within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

No. Speaker A is listing the possibilities. He is not stating that the professor is good at teaching or that A is a genius.

He is saying that one of these two options is likely. In fact he is implying that these are the only two options.

share|improve this answer
    
I'd agree, if A had said “not necessarily that he is good at teaching”, but “not necessarily the fact that he is good at teaching” is stronger than “just a possibility”. –  jwpat7 Mar 12 '13 at 1:21
1  
No. Using the fact that instead of simply that presupposes the that-clause. What it has to mean is that it's not simply the fact that he's good at teaching; i.e, there are other factors. –  John Lawler Mar 12 '13 at 3:35
    
I'd say that speaker A's intention is clear but his wording is poor. "the fact that" should definitely be replaced with "because," which would correct the questionable syntax of the sentence as well as clarify the meaning. –  Kyle Strand May 14 '13 at 19:13
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.