Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In our company, at the beginning of year, we have what is known as Goals Cascading. Essentially, the senior most people in the firm set goals for the entire firm and then the people at the next level set their own goals for their respective divisions which are aligned with the goals of their seniors. This process continues until we reach the level of an individual employee.

At the end of year, there is a review process on how well we did on our goals. This basically works the other way round. Individuals' reviews are collated to form teams' reviews which are further collated all the way upwards till there is a review of the entire firm on how well we did to achieve the goals set by us.

Now, my question. How do I complete this sentence with a suitable word:

At the beginning of year we have Goals Cascading and at the end of year we have Review ----------- .

I can think of words like Collation and Assimilation except that they don't give an idea of something moving up.

Any other ways of writing the same sentence while still using the phrase "Goals Cascading" and the word "Review" in it.

share|improve this question
    
If you have a progressive management, they may like 'reviews salmon-leaping'. No doubt J Lawler would have a name for this extended metaphor; I'll throw in the fluvial metaphor (but I bet it's not the actual term). –  Edwin Ashworth Mar 9 '13 at 10:49
    
Ascent comes to mind. –  jimbotherisenclown Mar 9 '13 at 12:16
    
Doesn't really include cascade in the antonym category. –  Edwin Ashworth Mar 9 '13 at 13:01
1  
Though it doesn't fit the metaphor, 'Review Reconciliation' is what is happening. –  Mitch Mar 9 '13 at 14:10
    
The word may have a negative connotation, but what about "critiquing"? "Evaluating"? –  rhetorician Mar 9 '13 at 18:03
show 2 more comments

7 Answers

At the beginning of year we have Goals Cascading and at the end of year we have Review ----------- .

The only words I can think of that seem to fit your criteria are capping and possibly culmination. A more practical candidate would be consolidation.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1 for consolidation –  Jim Mar 10 '13 at 20:07
add comment

The process of things moving in the direction counter to what you refer to as cascade is conventionally, escalate (upflow) in workflow terms.


[EDIT]

If initial attempts to resolve a user's problem are unsuccessful, most support groups have policies ... As you learned in Chapter 4, incident escalation is a normal process in which a problem is transferred to a higher level ... A Guide to Computer User Support for Help Desk & Support Specialists

share|improve this answer
1  
Can you give a more obvious reference to this usage, please? I can only see the 'rope in other (human) resources' implication for escalate in the reference you give. –  Edwin Ashworth Mar 9 '13 at 13:05
1  
@EdwinAshworth You need some background in workflow to understand the reference. And no, escalate is not to 'rope in other (human) resources'. See edit. –  Kris Mar 10 '13 at 10:12
1  
Thank you. I obviously missed Chapter 4. –  Edwin Ashworth Mar 10 '13 at 22:46
    
@EdwinAshworth missed Chapter 4. If you had sarcasm on mind, mind explaining? –  Kris Mar 17 '13 at 6:35
add comment

I have two options:

  1. In keeping with the metaphor of movement out and down, and then back up:

    At the end of the year we have Review Assembling.

    Considering that goals are going to be stacked on top of goals, this also expresses the interconnections of the entire network of goals.

  2. In keeping specifically with the metaphor of movement up and down:

    At the end of the year we have Review Tiering.

    This suggests a stacking upwards of reviews coming from different corporate substrata.


NB: In the language of the statement, you have "Goals Cascading", a plural noun followed by a participle which functions as an adjective. "Review (Word needed)" uses a noun followed by a participle that functions as a verb, as in,

"It's December. Let's do some review tiering".

This changes the structure used in "Goals Cascading" (noun, adjective). To maintain a parallel structure, you could consider,

At the beginning of year we have Goals Cascading and at the end of year we have Reviews ----------- .

share|improve this answer
add comment

If you want to keep it simple, then you could say that Cascading is used in the sense of "coming down from above", so perhaps you could say Ascending.

Cascade can also imply something coming from one tier down to the next, to the next and so on.

In software engineering, a behaviour that is transmitted up to the next layer, up to the next and so on is often described as Bubbling. It's probably as good a metaphor as Cascading in your context, especially if you imagine smaller bubbles coalescing to form larger ones on their way up through the hierarchy.

So: Cascading Goals and Bubbling Reviews.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1 Bubbling is the closest to an antonym of cascade that I've seen. Moreover, bubbling reviews sounds like the kind of enthusiastic corporate-speak that usually goes down well :| –  coleopterist Mar 9 '13 at 13:24
add comment

What you call "Goal Cascading" is what is also known as "Top-down goal setting", so the end-of-year process could be called "Bottom-up results reporting"

It's not very elegant but it is also not contrived.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Reminds me of the terms fan-out and fan-in from Electronics Engineering.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan-out

Alternatively, how about "Snowball"? "Goals cascade out and reviews snowball in."

share|improve this answer
add comment

"Roll-up" is generally used in these contexts. For e.g., reporting structure rolls up into Ms.xyz.

Similarly goals should roll-up into the top guy's goals.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for "roll-up". We also use "flow-down" in the context that OP uses "cascade". Goal cascading appears to be the flow-down and distribution of goals into lower level goals that are appropriate for each level. Roll-up would be the consolidation of the goal-results from the lower levels, matching them with the original goals at each level as they are rolled up. –  Jim Jul 18 '13 at 18:07
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.