Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

I know my sentence is dreadful but everyone now uses these words in this way, including my eight children aged 19—26. Yes, they are from Manchester but my husband uses he was took and he’s from Leicester.

This was never used when I was younger. Is there an easy way to explain why it is wrong, or do I have to accept it?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by coleopterist, Andrew Leach, tchrist, waiwai933 Mar 6 '13 at 18:33

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

3  
Haha silly Northerners. It's just incorrect. Sat is the past participle. You can't have "I was sat". –  user24964 Mar 6 '13 at 17:40

1 Answer 1

"He was took" is not technically correct English. If you wrote it in an English exam (even in the North of England) you would be marked down for it. I would never recommend using it in any kind of formal communication. The same is true of "I was sat".

However "not technically correct" does not mean "isn't used", or even "shouldn't be used". All of these are common in different parts of England, and some would consider them "dialects" of English, and those terms correct within that dialect.

So my recommendation is to learn to love and understand the variant grammar, but don't use it in a job application.

share|improve this answer
    
Well, it’s certainly not Standard English, that’s for sure. Other variants of English admit different forms, of course. –  tchrist Mar 6 '13 at 18:16

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.