Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A person can indulge in something. Is he therefore an indulger of something or an indulger in something? Are both okay?

If both are okay, is there any difference between these two phrases or are their meanings exactly the same?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers 3

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I’ve never seen either of those used. Logically, it would be in, but I’ve never seen that form. The Corpus of Contemporary American English is of the same opinion, and further points out that indulger is not widely used at all (and mostly by itself: “he was an indulger”).

share|improve this answer
    
I want to use the phrase in a humourous and quasi pretentious way. It's a bonus if it's not widely used or even strained as long as it is valid. :) –  darius Jan 29 '11 at 14:08
    
@darius then go for the logical construct: “an indulger in sugar” –  F'x Jan 29 '11 at 14:09
    
Problem is 'indulger of' fits better the way I want to use it. I want to know if it's completely off the track. –  darius Jan 29 '11 at 14:11
add comment

The Corpus of Contemporary American English contains the following sentence:

Was Jackson an indulger in and practitioner of nostalgia?

The sentence is used only in academic context, though, with a frequency of 0.01 per million.

Looking for indulger for doesn't return any result.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Indulge in means you yourself indulge; indulge of means you allow or enable indulgence in others.

I indulge in chocolate. I am indulgent of my daughters' appetite for clothing.

I don't think "indulger" is a real word.

share|improve this answer
    
Indulger is a word reported from the dictionaries (and not as example of a not existing word). –  kiamlaluno Jan 29 '11 at 17:31
    
You can make most verbs into nouns by adding -er, but that doesn't mean anyone else will use that word. "Indulger" only gets 66,000 hits on Google; c.f. 331,000 for "syzygy" (a technical word in astronomy, almost unknown among the general public), 122,000 "fahgettaboudit" (a phonetic rendering of "forget about it"), and 30,500 for "mofga" (a nonsense word I just made up -- admittedly, many of the hits were for the Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association) –  Malvolio Jan 29 '11 at 21:50
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.