# Alternative to priority value

Given two states in the diagram, each of them has a ? value, if state 1 ? value > state 2 ? value, we choose state 1, otherwise, we choose state 2.

We can replace ? by "priority", is there any other words that can fit into this sentence? Basically ? value is assigned randomly to both states (each state has different number) with the reason of choosing of state.

Is "dominant" good here?

-
I would substitute "'s rank": If state 1's rank value is greater than state 2's rank value then choose state 1 otherwise choose state 2. – Jim Feb 27 '13 at 2:52
Actually since you are assigning values, why not say, "state 1's assigned value" and "state 2's assigned value"? – Jim Feb 27 '13 at 5:08

You could rephrase it a bit to use "weight", or even "priority", like so:

Given two states in the diagram, each state has a value for [priority | weight | other?]. That sets up the following alternatives for the next sentence:

• If state 1 > state 2, we choose state 1.
• If state 1 has the greatest priority, we choose it.
• We choose the state with the greatest priority.
• If state 1 priority > state 2 priority, we choose state 1.
• etc.

I would personally opt for the third alternative. So I would say, "Given the two states in the diagram, each has a value for priority. We choose the state with the greatest priority."

It may be important for you to use the term "priority" in this case. Stop and ask yourself, what does the value really represent? Is it really priority? In that case, you should definitely use that term. If you get into the game of searching for an adequate synonym because it makes the writing sound better, then you're entering into euphemism. Technical writing is always clearer if you use the real terms, and stick to them consistently. So... Clearly set up the term usage in your passage, and it will make more sense in the long run.

Now, is "priority" better than "dominant"? Sorry, I can't answer that because I don't know the system you're describing. If it's your system, you have to sit down and work out what the value really does, and assign a term to it. If you're describing somebody else's system, you had better ask. In my experience, usage of terms like this can be very important. Again, describe the "reality* of the system, and don't look for euphemism.

-

I would go with some Greek letter, for example alpha. Alpha value sounds good. I'm unable to provide a more accurate answer as the question intent isn't very clear to me.

-
it's a good idea :) – william007 Feb 27 '13 at 2:28