Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Nothing else to add, I just want to make sure.

share|improve this question
2  
Don't make the mistake of assuming that a noun has to be a concrete noun or an abstract noun, Dee. They've been arguing about things like 'hole' (is it distinguishable by sight, or is it deducible, its surroundings being distinguishable by sight?) for years. I'd say that 12:30 has more of an 'existence' than a hole but less than a clock. But then we could start worrying about whether there is a deeper referent (the actual instant in time) behind the unique identifier (12:30) assigned to it. Leave it to the psycholinguists. –  Edwin Ashworth Feb 17 '13 at 14:38
    
Welcome to English Language & Usage. Please edit to include context (why you are asking) and results of your prior research. The helpfulness of those facts is why you are not allowed to leave the description blank. Thanks. –  MετάEd Feb 17 '13 at 16:17

2 Answers 2

Times of day,when expressed as digits, are, in essence, numerals, and numerals, in the words of the ‘Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English’, ‘form a rather self-contained area of English grammar.’ Numerals aren’t nouns of any kind, because they cannot be modified in the way that nouns can be modified. We can’t speak of a nice 12:30 or the 12:30 I was looking at yesterday.

share|improve this answer
    
The worst seven o'clock I remember? The most enjoyable lunchtime for months? –  TimLymington Feb 17 '13 at 18:08
    
If it's just considered a number word, then it would be a determiner. As for the nouns not being modified in the way nouns are, how would you modify length, patience, love, etc... (the "idea" form of nouns, ie., abstract nouns), with an adjective? –  Dee Feb 17 '13 at 18:16
    
@TimLymington. Sure, but those aren't numerals, and in any case the worst seven o'clock is an unlikely, but not impossible, thing for anyone to say. I've edited my answer slightly in the hope of making it clearer. –  Barrie England Feb 17 '13 at 18:16
    
@Dee; Truly, madly, deeply. (OK, a cheap shot, but I couldn't resist. –  TimLymington Feb 17 '13 at 18:20
    
The argument is seen to be contestable when one considers noon and midnight: we can’t speak of a nice noon or the noon I was looking at / had yesterday either, yet these words, synonymous with time-descriptor numerals, are considered nouns. And some numerals are used in plural forms: He was in his 80s in the 1960s. The temperature is in the mid-thirties. –  Edwin Ashworth Feb 17 '13 at 23:54

Is it breaktime yet? Every breaktime is a great time!
I can replace this with: It is 10:00 am yet? Every 10:00 am is a great 10:00 am! I call this a noun.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.