Now I'm having hard time on something.
I ate something yesterday and it was cold. Now grammatically, it must be
If it was not cold, I would like it more.
But I feel like it does not sound right, just because of 'like'. Is this correct?
|
Now I'm having hard time on something. I ate something yesterday and it was cold. Now grammatically, it must be If it was not cold, I would like it more. But I feel like it does not sound right, just because of 'like'. Is this correct? |
|||
|
|
|
There are two other ways of saying what you want said. The first point to consider, however, is that you ate whatever IT was yesterday, so your sentence has to be in the past tense.
Your feeling that your sentence is grammatically incorrect because of like is a proper feeling, because like should be liked. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
I believe this is a question of subjunctive verb moods. When deciding to use 'were' vs. 'was' (verb for 'to be') you need to think about the mood you're trying to communicate. In your example, you're talking about something that isn't true in a wishful tone: the food was too cold for your liking, ie. you wish it had been warmer. Therefore 'were' is the correct subjunctive because were is used to communicate a wish for something.
Same thing applies to your case.
is the correct way to phrase it. You use 'was' when talking about something certain, factual, or likely.
You can also rephrase your sentence to use 'was' - can you see why, in this example, 'was' is correct? (hint: 'was' = factual, ie. something that has happened already)
|
|||||||||
|
|
It doesn’t sound right because if it is something that you are experiencing in the present, something you are eating right now, then it should be more like this:
Whereas if it is something that has already occurred, something that we ate yesterday or last week or whatnot, then it should be more like this:
|
||||
|
|