Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In academic writing, it is common to refer to or prove properties about the main object of an article.

If I prove a property for (some object), I know I can use the phrase:

Property X holds for the object Y.

But, can an object hold a property?

Furthermore, object Y holds some additional properties.

It always sounded "natural" to me (I'm not a native speaker), but now that I'm trying to verify my sentence construction using Google, I just can't seem to find anything useful.

share|improve this question
    
An object holding a property can imply something different: "Looking at the specification the objects of the connections variable doesn't seem to hold a property/function to check if the connection is still alive." stackoverflow.com/questions/13662089/… –  Kris Feb 14 '13 at 15:13
    
@Kris how is that example different? Can you please elaborate? –  penelope Feb 14 '13 at 15:27
    
It is elaborate and more at the link. If that doesn't help, you need more background preparation in the subject of OOP, not the English language. –  Kris Feb 15 '13 at 6:56
    
@Kris, I've been programming for years now. But the "property" in OOP comes from exactly that -- you're modeling an object, and methods (functions) belonging to that object will model the properties of that object (... "which that object holds") –  penelope Feb 15 '13 at 10:27
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Property X holds for the object Y.

This uses hold in the sense "to be valid or true". We can also use "holds true for".

Furthermore, object Y holds some additional properties.

This is using hold in the sense "to have, to possess". So it's valid, but that the same word is used for each is a coincidence.

The latter is a rare use though. I would favour has or maybe exhibits, over holds as more usual.

share|improve this answer
    
I was aware of the fact that it's used with a different meaning, as you said "the sense you use it in is different". It was just somebodies comment when reading my writing: "I've seen this already in the form A (1st example), but not in this form B you're using (2nd example)" But, thank you for your answers, especially fore more common alternatives. –  penelope Feb 14 '13 at 12:58
1  
@John Hanna. The second form is not rare in academic writing. –  The Frog Feb 15 '13 at 1:51
    
@TheFrog all the better then. Would you say it was as common as exhibits or has, though? –  Jon Hanna Feb 15 '13 at 10:14
    
@TheFrog That must be where I picked up the phrase in the first place :) –  penelope Feb 15 '13 at 10:28
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.