456
four hundred fifty-six.
four, five, six.
Is there any rule or something? Is the second one just for faster pronunciation?
|
456 four hundred fifty-six. four, five, six. Is there any rule or something? Is the second one just for faster pronunciation? |
|||||||||
|
|
If there is a general rule to find, then it's almost certainly down to speed. [I'm in the UK, there may be regional differences] Bus numbers are generally read as numbers up to 100 (read as "The eighty-eight runs from Vauxhall to Westminster, as does the eighty-seven") and as separate digits from 101 onwards ("The four-three-six runs from Paddington to Lewisham"). Similarly with road numbers: "The A twenty-seven runs from Hastings to Bournemouth; the A two-seven-two runs from Winchester to Heathfield." However, if you're actually counting, then it's always a number:
That number would always be read as "one hundred [and] fifty-three", not individual digits. |
|||||
|
|
Where I am (New Jersey) you will generally hear "four hundred and fifty-six" with the occasionally "four hundred fifty-six." I use individual numbers when I speak (especially to my kids) so that there can be no confusion (Fifty? I thought you said fifteen.) |
|||
|
|
|
The rule (which, I take it from the other answers, might be confined to the US) is that a string of digit that doesn't name a quantity are pronounced individually. So
is typically said
(Similarly, the quantity 0 is called "zero", but the digit 0, in a phone number, for example, is "oh".) |
|||||
|
It's just more colloquial.
Sort of. Saying 456 as four hundred fifty-six, seems to be an American thing. It's not literally, the English way to pronounce it. English and other British people would pronounce this and other, such numbers with the word and between the hundred and the next number. Therefore, they would pronounce it as four hundred and fifty-six. |
|||
|
|