English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why are there different ways of indicating gender for animals? For instance, by inflexion we get:

lion (male) & lioness (female)

where the female is distinguished from the male. Here the male is also known by the general (have I used this correctly?) term for this type of animal, i.e. lion.

But, in another instance, we have:

duck (female) & drake (male)

where the male is distinguished from the female by a distinct or different word and also from the general term for this type of fowl, i.e. duck.

Then, for kangaroos and rabbits, we have:

buck (male) & doe (female)

where neither are known by the general term, nor is there any inflexion; instead, distinct names are used.

Why do these different ways for indicating gender exist? Why is it that in some cases the male is differentiated from the female and vice-versa. And why in some cases are both female and male known by words so different from the general term used to describe them?

share|improve this question
As an Australian, from now on I'll sing "Doe, a kangaroo. A female kangaroo..." :D – Cam Jackson Feb 16 '12 at 6:21
up vote 4 down vote accepted

To take one of your examples, doe is from old English deon, to suck, and was used to describe a female animal of a number of kinds. buck is from old English bucca, a he-goat. The unisex rabbit is from Flemish. So the words buck and doe appear originally to have meant the male and female of any animal, and have presumably become specialised in referring to deer, rabbits, and certain other kinds of animals.

Ram and sheep are both derived from old English, in the case of ram a word meaning fighting sheep. (Ewe is from Latin.) I'd hazard a guess that in old England there were fighting sheep (males) and sheep (all the others, including wethers).

Hope this helps (all this from the Collins English Dictionary, except the suppositions and guesswork).

share|improve this answer
Thanks for shedding some light on the issue. Would you happen to know why the male duck (drake) is differentiated from the female duck (duck) and not the other way around? – Sky Red Jan 28 '11 at 18:46
@Sky Red, sadly, no. According to Merriam-Webster, duck is about 200 years older than drake, but other than that it's no help. ( merriam-webster.com/dictionary/drake , merriam-webster.com/dictionary/duck?show=0&t=1296240610 ) – Brian Hooper Jan 28 '11 at 18:53
and at the same time 'deer' meant any wild animal, from the German 'tier'. Hence deer park was just a hunting area. – mgb Apr 14 '11 at 2:33

Because they come from a time when people were more intimately involved with animals than they are now. Nowadays most people can't tell the difference between a hen and a rooster, but 500 years ago they sure could. Most of the terms you'll encounter of this nature come either from farming or hunting, which were big parts of the economy of the average village. You won't see this in newly discovered species for the same reason.

share|improve this answer
I'd mostly agree, but doesn't it take a while for male and female forms of an animal to get separate names anyway? – Andrew Grimm Jan 28 '11 at 5:12
Interesting answer, but do you have references? – Jürgen A. Erhard Jan 28 '11 at 8:38
@jae: Sadly, all I can offer is that I remember reading this in an article some years ago while researching a college paper in the library (remember libraries?). The author's point was partially inferential, noting that the terms mainly came from Old English and that England was an agrarian society at that time (as was most of the world), as well as the fact that the more closely involved a people are with a subject, the more vocabulary they acquire to describe its aspects. It would have been important to distinguish, say, a bull from a cow, etc. – Robusto Jan 28 '11 at 13:08
Thank you for the answer, but I'm not looking for an explanation on why they are differentiated, rather I want to know why it's duck and drake instead of duck and duckess, for instance. Or why buck and doe, instead of rabbit and rabbitess or kangaroo and kangaress(?!)? Thanks. – Sky Red Jan 28 '11 at 18:15

It's not one word became two, it's two became one. Other creatures evolved gender-neutral term over time, while these didn't, somewhy. Lion is by the way, almost did: it can be either he-lion or she-lion, it's not a mistake to say "she's a lion" about lioness.

And we still use different words for humans too — “woman” and “man”. In languages other than English, the “woman” word has no “man” inside it, they are absolutely different words.

In old languages, every noun had gender, even non-living things. Many languages still have this, e.g. Italian “home/house” is female (“casa”) and Russian one is male (“дом”). The language structure is such so even synthetic made-up words are perceived either as male or female.

share|improve this answer
Why some creatures evolved gender-neutral terms and others didn't is interesting. It seems like those animals that did are the ones most useful to man, such as farm animals (nod to Robusto). Thanks. – Sky Red Jan 28 '11 at 18:14

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.