Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Observed some words get pronounced with a /sh/ rather than /s/ in certain situations.

  • Stripes as "Shtripes" (from some "The Wire" episode)
  • Screw it as "shcrew it" (from a rap song)

In both situations, it seems to be a matter of emphasis, but is there some generic etymological root to this, e.g. a yiddish language background?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I do this. It is called palatalization and is caused by the "tr" combo more than anything. The same process also occurs without "s", and with "dr". I often say, for example, "tree" as [tʃri] ("chree") and "drier" as [dʒrajɚ] ("jrier").

These variants don't come from Yiddish, German, or any other language. It is simply a natural phonological process that occurs in many languages, often due to co-articulatory factors.

So, in this particular case, it is caused because our English "r" sound ([ɹ] to be precise, but for simplicity I'll just use the symbol [r]) is articulated slightly further back in the mouth than [t] or [d]. In anticipation of that "r", the "t" gets pulled back, which sounds like [tʃ] ("ch").

When you add "s" into the mix, it just stretches this co-articulation further, causing palatalization of the "s" and the "t". You actually end up with something like [ʃtʃrit] for "street" ([strit]).

Why do people do it? Well, it is normal language change, but as it is a feature of certain dialects, it can make something you say come off as more dialectal; so, one would do this for the same reasons one would use other colloquial or dialectal language. I would be much more likely to say this around family and friends than at work; I consider it to be friendlier sounding when I speak that way to my wife, for example.


In some languages, a given palatalization process can remain a dialectal variant or only occur with free-variation between the standard and palatalized versions. But, it can also permanently establish itself in the language, and become a regular rule that is always followed.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the detailed insights! Since my examples came from certain situations, I suspected a more socio-linguistic background. But then, both my examples come from work of fictions and thus may be just dramatized. –  miku Jan 27 '11 at 17:18

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.