Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is this:

1 He did come home late yesterday.

a sloppy variation of:

2 He came home late yesterday.

because of poor editing under adverse writing conditions? Could the writer have originally intended to write:

He came home late yesterday.

but accidentally wrote:

He did not come home late yesterday.

And during editing, the writer removed the 'not', but forgot to remove 'did' and change 'come' to past tense?

share|improve this question
We need context to tell whether "He did come home ..." is appropriate here. – Peter Shor Feb 3 at 22:23
He did come home late yesterday is apparently a confirmation. There's nothing wrong with it grammatically or otherwise. Unless there's more context given, your opinions about the editor can't be validated. – Chris Feb 3 at 22:31

closed as not constructive by tchrist, Carlo_R., Mahnax, StoneyB, Kris Feb 4 at 6:34

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.

2 Answers

Let us analyse the logic table:

           Late  NotLate
Did         A      B
Did not     C      D

A:

He came home late yesterday

B:

He came home, but was not late.
He did not come home late.

C:

He did not come home, but he was late.

D:

He did not come home, therefore he could not even be late.

Therefore,

He did come home late yesterday

is case A.

However,

He did not come home late yesterday

is not case C, but a combination of possibility of B, C or D:

  • D: He did not come home late yesterday, because he never did come home yesterday.
  • B: He did not come home late yesterday, but he did come home. He was early.
  • C: He came home late but not yesterday. He did not come home yesterday. He came home this morning.

That is, in a two-bit binary event,

{Not A} does not equal {C}

but

{Not A} equals {B | C | D}

Normally,

He did {perform}

is an affirmative form of

He {performed}.

Child 1: Mom, I did not eat ice cream as you told me not to.

Child 2: Mom, he did ice cream.

Child 1: No, I did not.

Child 2: Mom, he did. He ate ice cream.

Placing the word did does not modify the sentence logic but its emphasis. And therefore, your conjecture on the sentence having gone thro a series of typographical inaccuracies need not be made, because people do use did in such manner to emphasize. It is not sloppy, but a deliberate emphasis. You are seldom sloppy when you deliberately endeavour.

share|improve this answer

“He came home late” and “he did not come” have very different meanings.

share|improve this answer
1  
He did come home late and He came home late are also different: I think this is what OP is asking about. – TimLymington Feb 3 at 22:23
@TimLymington So, "he DID COME home late" is intentionally different from "he CAME home late"? – user36924 Feb 3 at 22:30
1  
@ertella: The connotations are certainly different; the intentions of the writer cannot be divined from a simple phrase. (He did come home late is usually an assertion of what is assumed to be denied. Either Despite what you claim, he really did or It's perfectly true that he did come home late, but perhaps he just got lost) – TimLymington Feb 3 at 22:49