Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 4 down vote favorite
2

Which of these two statements seems to be more appropriate?

  1. I am attending a meeting tomorrow.
  2. I am going to attend a meeting tomorrow.

I am quite not sure which one to use.

share|improve this question
I would use the shorter sentence. "Brevity is the soul of wit". – user21497 Feb 2 at 9:25
1  
They are equal. Your two answers show that some people think one is better, but other people think the opposite. If the speaker and the listener are in the two different camps all subtlety is lost. – mhoran_psprep Feb 2 at 13:24

3 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

English can use both the present progressive construction, as in your first sentence, and going to, as in your second sentence, to express the future. Both describe a future event, arrangement or intention. However, going to suggests a little more strongly than the present progressive that the event is fixed and cannot be changed. The choice between the two depends on the context, and the impression that the speaker wishes to convey.

EDIT: This view is based on the relevant entry in ‘An A-Z of English Grammar and Usage’ by Leech and others. Carter and McCarthy in their ‘Cambridge Grammar of the English Language take a rather different view:

Be going to usually indicates that . . . the event will take place soon, but that all the necessary arrangements have not yet been made.

The present progressive usually indicates that . . . arrangements are probably in place or have been made.

You will see that they are careful to hedge their claims with usually. In practice, the choice between the two forms depends on the context, the impression that the speaker wishes to convey, the speaker’s purpose and the relationship between the participants in the conversation. For example, a speaker, asked to do someone else’s work tomorrow, might reply, ‘I’m sorry, I’m attending a meeting tomorrow’ and not ‘I’m sorry, I’m going to attend a meeting tomorrow.’ The difference is slight, but can be used to fine tune a speaker’s ideational and interpersonal meaning, depending on circumstances.

share|improve this answer
I agree. Going to attend does indicate more certainty than I am attending. – user32480 Feb 2 at 9:23
up vote 2 down vote

The first "I'm attending a meeting tomorrow" gives the listener/reader almost 100% certainty that you will attend. The second one "I am going to attend a meeting tomorrow" gives the reader/listener the idea that you have the intention. You plan on it, but something could come up.

share|improve this answer
1  
As you will see, my answer suggests the opposite! – Barrie England Feb 2 at 8:57
up vote -1 down vote

Both forms mean exactly the same thing. I think that a speaker may subconsciously feel that adding unnecessary verbiage like "going to" gives the listener time to prepare mentally to process the words most likely to follow.

The phrase "go ahead and..." is likely the most often used unnecessary phrase in English. For example, I've heard the following on a DIY show: "Go ahead and measure the board. Now go ahead and cut it. Then go ahead and sand it." Leave out that phrase and no information is lost.

Another possible subconscious purpose of using such "empty" phrases could be that speaking concisely may sound curt, or brusque, and thus unfriendly, while adding empty phrases makes the speech sound more relaxed and friendly.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.