English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

We're building a feature for a website and trying to think of a hypernym for clients, partners and members so that the feature remains generic enough for re-use later on other websites.

share|improve this question
Clients/partners/members of what? – ElendilTheTall Jan 30 '13 at 9:11
@ElendilTheTall That would depend on who we're building the website for. A law firm, for example, might have clients and partners while a not-for-profit organization might have only members and no clients (per se). We're trying to avoid having to build a separate module for every different type of organization, hence the need for a generic term. – Xhantar Jan 30 '13 at 9:31
up vote 12 down vote accepted

Stakeholders would be the term.

Stakeholders : A person, group or organization that has interest or concern in an organization. Some examples of key stakeholders are creditors, directors, employees, government (and its agencies), owners (shareholders), suppliers, unions, and the community from which the business draws its resources.

share|improve this answer

You might try stakeholders:-

  1. (Economics, Accounting & Finance / Banking & Finance) a person or group owning a significant percentage of a company's shares
  2. (Business / Industrial Relations & HR Terms) a person or group not owning shares in an enterprise but affected by or having an interest in its operations, such as the employees, customers, local community, etc.
share|improve this answer

Less sophisticated than "stakeholders" is associates.

Associate: person joined with another or others in an enterprise, business, etc.; partner; colleague.

share|improve this answer
But a client cannot be termed as an associate. – KeyBrd Basher Jan 30 '13 at 10:14

I was thinking about the word "organisations" but I'm not sure if it's generic enough.

share|improve this answer

Would generically referring to them as collaborators suffice?

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.