Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there such a word as "drownded"? I would say "drowned" but I am hearing "drownded" so often I am beginning to wonder.

For example:

He went into the deepest waters and drownded.

share|improve this question

4 Answers

Drownd is an archaic form of drown from which drownded is an archaic form of drowned. It is still found in some dialects either by survival or by emphasis of the -ed since the rhymes-with-round sound of drowned may not sound as obviously past-tense to some ears as others.

It's incorrectly frowned upon as incorrect, by people whose dialects did not retain drownd and drownded, and worth avoiding for that reason, especially in writing - so as to not only be correct, but to be seen to be correct.

But likewise, since it isn't really incorrect, the only time it is appropriate to criticise someone for using it is if you are enforcing a style-guide (when you can criticise any decision that goes against it). Those using it are not wrong.

Edit: In the dialect I grew up with, we were familiar with all four of drownd, drownded, drown and drowned. We knew that the latter two were received English, and would use them in writing, or when we wished to avoid dialectical words to "speak proper". I did not know they were retentions (my dialect has a good few retentions, some Hibernicisms, some borrowings from Ulster-Scots, and some presumably inventions of its own, but only as someone with an interest in such matters in later life do I know a bit about which are which), but we did use them. In general speech we favoured drown and drownded because drownd and drowned sound quite close to each other, while drown and drownded are clearly differentiated>

share|improve this answer
4  
I think it might be construed as wrong because it sounds like the person is saying "drowned-ed", like a little kid might. – Joe Z. Jan 26 at 15:53
@JoeZeng that's what I mean when I say that while in some dialects it exists from survival, it may be that in others it came from emphasis upon the ed. Consider that if we wanted to stress that something was in the past tense we might well put extra stress on the -ed part of the word that doesn't exist in the normal pronunciation. Whether kids do it or not doesn't affect whether it is now a full part of a given dialect. – Jon Hanna Jan 26 at 15:57
3  
I think your use if 'correct' is too academic. Most native speakers of -all- current varieties of English would regard 'drownded' as terribly incorrect. – Mitch Jan 26 at 16:36
@Mitch I think your "all" is factually correct there. I hope it is, and you aren't saying that some of us are in some way inferior to those who grew up in other parts of the English-speaking world. – Jon Hanna Jan 26 at 16:48
1  
@FumbleFingers are we only to restrict "correct" to what is standard English, and speak of dialect only as a deviation into error regardless of context? I stand by my answer; it is dialectical English, found in several dialects, and is appropriate in cases where dialectical English is appropriate. – Jon Hanna Jan 26 at 21:40
show 8 more comments

The OED (Oxford English Dictionary) gives drownded as an alternative to drowned and there are ten citations throughout the dictionary illustrating its earlier use, but its use now is described as ‘vulgar’.

Stick to drowned.

share|improve this answer
Not online - is the free online version a limited subset of the full dictionary? – Stuart Jan 26 at 19:20
@Stuart. This is the OED: oed.com. It requires a paid subscription. The various other Oxford dictionaries are not the same thing. – Barrie England Jan 26 at 19:43
2  
@Barrie: I think it was you who altered me to the fact that (in the UK, at least), you can access OED with your library card number. – FumbleFingers Jan 26 at 21:22
Yes, that's right. Other works of reference too. – Barrie England Jan 26 at 21:29

Merriam-Webster's 3rd Unabridged Dictionary of English (MW3UDE) lists "drownded" as a nonstandard spelling of drowned, which means that it has enough history to justify its use, but that it's probably not going to be seen very often, if ever, in formal English writing. Drowned is the current standard spelling.

share|improve this answer

c1850 – c1950 the heyday of drownded:

enter image description here

Too early to call it entirely wrong or deprecate it, perhaps.

share|improve this answer
Heyday? What about 'drowned'? You're only comparing 'drownded' with 'drownd', two rare alternatives to 'drowned'. I dont think it is -that- early to judge. – Mitch Jan 27 at 16:19
1  
@Mitch Including drowned will definitely drown both these lines in the graph because of the huge difference. You have seen it happen, right? We can only compare comparables. – Kris Jan 28 at 4:13

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.