Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Regarding the fact that a company is made up of people and we use who for people, is it proper to use who here?

share|improve this question
    
who is also found in writing, though only with a singular, not plural, verb: who make. –  Kris Jan 19 '13 at 10:59
    
"Pectin: List of Firms who Manufacture Or Sell Either Dried Or Liquid Pectin" (United States. Bureau of Chemistry and Soils, 1931); "In this chapter, however, subcontractor refers to the second type of company, that is, those who manufacture according to the buyers' specifications." (Mark S. Glynn: Business-To-Business Brand Management, 2009); "Mainstream chemical companies who manufacture some aroma chemicals as part of their business, e.g. BASF..." (David Rowe: Chemistry & Technology of Flavours & Fragrances, 2009) [emphasis mine] –  Kris Jan 19 '13 at 11:17
    
As Kris mentioned, who gets used, but it looks like that is used in this context much more often. –  J.R. Jan 19 '13 at 11:36

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

A company is normally, but not invariably, treated as inanimate, so it will be a company which makes or a company that makes, when the relative clause is integrated (also known as ‘defining’ or ‘restrictive’). When the relative clause is supplementary (also known as ‘non-defining’ or ‘non-restrictive’), it is normally introduced by which.

This means that we can say XYZ Inc. is a company that makes high tensile steel or we can say XYZ Inc. is a company which makes high tensile steel. But we generally say XYZ Inc., which makes high tensile steel, has had poor results this year rather than XYZ Inc., that makes high tensile steel, has had poor results this year. Some people claim that you cannot use which to introduce an integrated relative clause, but they are wrong.

(There is a further complication with a word like company, which is seen variously as singular and plural. For the sake of simplicity, I have treated it here as singular.)

share|improve this answer
    
What about a group? –  Benyamin Hamidekhoo Jan 19 '13 at 9:22
    
@Benyamin Hamidekhoo. It depends on the type of group. –  Barrie England Jan 19 '13 at 11:27

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.